Teams

Nair/Memphis

2025 Adult 40 & Over-Memphis · 3.0 Women 40 & over

17 players · average NTRP 2.90 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-13vs Stout/MemphisLost 12
L#2 DoublesAmasa Lacy / Jennifer Sigan vs Leslie Darling / Jo Picha3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDeepa Nair / Ann Yackel vs Mary Durham / Ellen Skinner6-4, 6-4
L#4 DoublesChing Cushing-Murray / Amy Worrell Sterling vs Terrie Dietsch / Susan Northen-Lacy1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-12vs Crowder/MemphisLost 14
L#1 DoublesJennifer Sigan / Lisa Monahan vs Linda Bryan / Angela Melton4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPamela Pierski vs Amasa Lacy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathy Poulin / Molly Schmidt vs Krista Weber / Angie Ware3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLetitia Phillips / Deepa Nair vs Sandra Horn / Melissa Hurt7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesChing Cushing-Murray / Chancey Thompson vs Kathy Crowder / Terri Amacker7-6, 7-6
2025-03-09vs Stout/MemphisLost 12
W#2 DoublesAnn Yackel / Tarshian Moon vs Courtney Perrin / Sandra Horn7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMorgan Pippen / Deepa Nair vs Terrie Dietsch / Ellen Skinner5-7, 3-6
L#4 DoublesMelody Greene / Jennifer Larkin vs Leslie Darling / Krista Weber1-6, 2-6
2025-03-08vs Crowder/MemphisLost 14
L#1 DoublesCathy Poulin / Tarshian Moon vs Jo Picha / Krista Weber6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHeather Purzner vs Amasa Lacy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRoz Wallace / Lisa Monahan vs Debbie Pacheco / Sandra Horn5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLetitia Phillips / Kathye Sbravati vs Linda Bryan / Angie Ware0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesLisa Evans / Melissa Taras vs Ellen Skinner / Carrie Moore2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 40 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Jennifer Sigan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Cathy Poulin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Heather Purzner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Kristin Russum
published
2.79
Kathye Sbravati
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Deepa Nair
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Lisa Monahan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Tarshian Moon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Roz Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Ching Cushing-Murray
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Chancey Thompson
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Letitia Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Melody Greene
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Jennifer Larkin
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Melissa Taras
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Becky Brady
published 2.5
Pamela Pierski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Monahan + Cathy Poulin224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Monahan + Deepa Nair033 matchesnot enough data
Deepa Nair + Letitia Phillips123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Sigan
19W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Cathy Poulin
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
Heather Purzner
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Kristin Russum
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Kathye Sbravati
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Deepa Nair
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Lisa Monahan
12W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Tarshian Moon
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
Roz Wallace
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Ching Cushing-Murray
13W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Chancey Thompson
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Letitia Phillips
10W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Melody Greene
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Jennifer Larkin
7W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Melissa Taras
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
2.5
Becky Brady
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Pamela Pierski
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.