Teams

A55 6.0W LT Marschik

2022 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over · NEOTA A55&O 6.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-21vs A55 6.0W CV FlockenWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Barker / Myra Lakin vs Jane Stricker / Janice Kovalcheck2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJinjun Bao / Sharon Kimmell vs Carol Duber / Casey Krenn6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Bissell / Carol Peter vs Denise Derbyshire / Karen O'Hearn6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-07-14vs A55 6.0W PW BlesiWon 21
W#1 DoublesJinjun Bao / Sharon Kimmell vs Diane Blesi / Joan Hoty6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Barker / Maureen Huscroft vs Mary Beth Gifford / Kelly Haas6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKim Marschik / Melissa Nemeth vs Dianne Dugan / Ellen McCarthy0-6, 3-6
2022-06-30vs A55 6.0W MV SandsWon 21
L#1 DoublesMyra Lakin / Linda Barker vs Lynn Sands / Carol Feltoon2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Peter / Melissa Nemeth vs Wendy Hunter / Rebecca Fricke1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSloane Burgess / Renee Hansen vs Pamela Thomas / Kelly Gest6-0, 6-0
2022-06-23vs A55 6.0W AVW YazvacLost 12
W#1 DoublesJinjun Bao / Melissa Nemeth vs Nancy Ferraro / Susan Rossi4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Barker / Maureen Huscroft vs Linda Fabrizio / Lou Ann Fredericka3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Kimmell / Denise Mead vs Joni Blase / Jean Mellott3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-16vs A55 6.0W WR BanksWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Barker / Myra Lakin vs Teri Mollison / Beth Sosinski6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatricia Bissell / Sharon Kimmell vs Nancy Gasparovic / Sharon Strobach6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Marschik / Linda Wood vs Elizabeth Banks / Terri Treblas6-0, 6-2
2022-06-09vs A55 6.0W NC WilkinsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJinjun Bao / Linda Wood vs Laurie Craven / Jing Zhou3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Kimmell / Kim Marschik vs Christine Johnson / Mary Slee6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSloane Burgess / Renee Hansen vs Janice Hall Moore / Ellen Miller6-2, 6-3
2022-06-02vs A55 6.0W GR CroskeyWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Barker / Jinjun Bao vs Marie Wagner / Patricia Croskey6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelissa Nemeth / Maureen Huscroft vs Cora Calibag / Patty Martell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Bissell / Carol Peter vs Marilyn Carrell / Kathleen Prasnal6-1, 6-4
2022-05-19vs A55 6.0W TP CoonWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Kimmell / Myra Lakin vs Lori Young / Sandra Hunsicker6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJinjun Bao / Melissa Nemeth vs Janel Ciolli / Ruth Meadows6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKim Marschik / Denise Mead vs Laurie Fortune / Gina Myers6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-12vs A55 6.0W MV LippWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaureen Huscroft / Linda Barker vs Peggy Lipp / Christine Wilkinson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Mead / Myra Lakin vs Diane Tiede / Susan Waychoff6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Bissell / Linda Wood vs Maryanne Miller / Linda Ehrbar6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · NEOTA A55&O 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A55 6.0W LT Marschik7220720200
2A55 6.0W AVW Yazvac7219822224
3A55 6.0W CV Flocken72171023208
4A55 6.0W PW Blesi63161126224
5A55 6.0W TP Coon54141332267
6A55 6.0W MV Sands45141330252
7A55 6.0W WR Banks45101738280
8A55 6.0W NC Wilkinson27121531241
9A55 6.0W GR Croskey2781943294
10A55 6.0W MV Lipp1852245292

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Maureen Huscroft
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Jinjun Bao
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Sloane Burgess
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Peter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Denise Mead
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Kim Marschik
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Barker
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Linda Wood
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Melissa Nemeth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Myra Lakin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Patricia Bissell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Renee Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Kimmell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Marschik + Sharon Kimmell6950% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Bissell + Sharon Kimmell7556% gamesnot enough data
Denise Mead + Melissa Nemeth5554% gamesnot enough data
Renee Hansen + Sloane Burgess8158% gamesnot enough data
Kim Marschik + Jinjun Bao6257% gamesnot enough data
Kim Marschik + Melissa Nemeth4448% gamesnot enough data
Myra Lakin + Kim Marschik5260% gamesnot enough data
Myra Lakin + Denise Mead3456% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maureen Huscroft
54W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
2.90
Jinjun Bao
91W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.89
Sloane Burgess
104W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Carol Peter
19W–20L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Denise Mead
40W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Marschik
56W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%77%23%
2.41
Linda Barker
46W–33L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Wood
17W–8L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Nemeth
49W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Myra Lakin
43W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Bissell
51W–23L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Renee Hansen
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Kimmell
43W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.