Teams

Gateway - Blackmon

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Adult 18 & Over Fall ESL · 3.5 W Tuesday Eve

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-11vs ESL Fall Winner/UTC-MonahanLost 01
L#1 DoublesLucia Parvan / Alisha Daines vs Melissa Dorr / Nancy Aloia2-6, 4-6
2024-11-19vs Paseo-DingwallLost 04
L#1 DoublesLinda Blackmon / Amanda Pearson vs Wendy Dingwall / Colleen Doyle7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlisha Daines vs Amanda Patten6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Palmeri / Bonita Spight-Williams vs Andrea Cooke / Kelly Olson4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKellie Wagner / Peggy Inniss vs Shelly Zimmer Wald / Diane Borillo3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-10-15vs Paseo-DingwallLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Blackmon / Lucia Parvan vs Amanda Patten / Denise Reynard3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-01vs Lake Kennedy - RiccioLost 01
L#1 SinglesLucia Parvan vs Heather Humann7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Tuesday Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kristine Johnston
published
3.44
Lucia Parvan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.33
Lisa Palmeri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Sylvia Lamantia
published
3.31
Donna Douglass
published
3.21
Peggy Inniss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Bonita Spight-Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Jan Kahnke
published
3.07
Alisha Daines
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Linda Blackmon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Cynthia Gentleman
published 3.5
3.00
Debbie Conley
published 3.5
2.72
Amanda Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kellie Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Catala
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Johnston
29W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
Lucia Parvan
84W–89L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Lisa Palmeri
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Sylvia Lamantia
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Donna Douglass
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Peggy Inniss
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Bonita Spight-Williams
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jan Kahnke
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Alisha Daines
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Linda Blackmon
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cynthia Gentleman
2W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.03
3.5
Debbie Conley
1W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
Amanda Pearson
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.72
Kellie Wagner
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Catala
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.