Teams

CBRC-Porter

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-16vs PC-Hit and RunSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeidi Bucheli / David Porter vs Bart Munson / Tammy Deery6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRidha Mabrouki / Lory Allen vs John Hilmes / Patty Aoyama2-6, 6-7
2026-08-15vs EW-CBRC-Foss/ColesLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela Cragin / Scot Hymas vs Larry Bagaasen / Theresa Koehler1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Porter / Heidi Bucheli vs James Chandler / Candee Foss6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDaniel Cragin / Lory Allen vs Barry Vedder / Anne Neuberger2-6, 3-6
2026-08-15vs PC-Hit and RunLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Cragin / Heidi Bucheli vs Bart Munson / Kathleen Galioto5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAngela Cragin / Ridha Mabrouki vs Patty Aoyama / John Hilmes6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Porter / Diane Molleson vs Tammy Deery / Lawrence Shepherd3-6, 2-6
2026-08-14vs EW-CBRC-Foss/ColesLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Cragin / Heidi Bucheli vs Barry Vedder / Anne Neuberger6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Cragin / Scot Hymas vs Bryan Coles / Amy Hoins3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Porter / Lory Allen vs Larry Bagaasen / Candee Foss3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Angela Cragin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Diane Molleson
published 3
2.69
David Porter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Daniel Cragin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Ridha Mabrouki
published
2.50
Lory Allen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Heidi Bucheli
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.29
Scot Hymas
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Cragin
60W–62L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.03
3
Diane Molleson
2W–27L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
David Porter
2W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Daniel Cragin
27W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Ridha Mabrouki
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
2.58
3
Lory Allen
23W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Heidi Bucheli
6W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Scot Hymas
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.