Teams

Claxton

2024 Norfolk Adult 18 & Over · Norfolk Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.20 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-20vs Team KezmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaroline Dozier / Lexi Rawls vs Stacy Hennessy / Deborah Brewster6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShelley Smith / Sheryl Harris vs Lauren Cruz / Olivia Self1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-05-13vs Team KezmanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesShannon Heisler / Lexi Rawls vs Deborah Brewster / Rycy Godette2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSheryl Harris / Shelley Smith vs Adelle Yanez / Olivia Self3-6, 5-7
2024-05-06vs Team KezmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesLexi Rawls / Caroline Dozier vs Susan Willard / Rycy Godette6-4, 6-1
2024-04-27vs Team KezmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesShannon Heisler / Shelley Smith vs Lauren Cruz / Neely Zervakis3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Norfolk Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Barbara Rose
published 4.5
4.31
Rebecca Jucksch
published
4.29
Kelly Martone
published
4.23
Katherine Claxton
published
4.21
Shelley O'Malley
published
4.18
Shannon Heisler
published
4.11
Liz Tuck
published
4.08
Kimberly McClernon
published
4.02
Lexi Rawls
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Tijen Ireland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Sheryl Harris
published
3.78
Shelley Smith
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.75
Caroline Dozier
published 4
Helen Baumann
published
Laurie Marshall
published
Mafalda Lhorca
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheryl Harris + Shelley Smith044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Barbara Rose
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
4.35
Rebecca Jucksch
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
Kelly Martone
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.29
Katherine Claxton
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Shelley O'Malley
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Shannon Heisler
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
Liz Tuck
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.11
Kimberly McClernon
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.08
4
Lexi Rawls
80W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Tijen Ireland
83W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Sheryl Harris
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.78
4.5
Shelley Smith
30W–72L career · 8 lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.78
4
Caroline Dozier
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Helen Baumann
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurie Marshall
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mafalda Lhorca
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.