Teams

LTFC BLUE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-02vs WC WHITEWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Goodnough / Jennifer Loehr vs Andrea Kolbet / Karen Steketee6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-08-26vs SS-H YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Marle / Karen Allaire vs Monica Reidelbach / Debra Sherwood6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRebecca McIlwaine vs Tina Burton2-6, 5-7
2024-08-19vs SS-D GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Loehr / Emily Marle vs DeAnne Smith / Ann Gallagher6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-12vs KC-RH REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Marle / Rebecca McIlwaine vs Lori Galyk / Mallory Clark6-1, 6-3
2024-08-10vs HW BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesRebecca McIlwaine / Emily Marle vs Karlie Boone / Brittany Norris6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Loehr vs Eli Boone6-3, 6-4
2024-07-29vs KNO PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Loehr / Rebecca McIlwaine vs Jodi Page / Jenni Young5-7, 3-6
2024-07-22vs FOX GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Marle / Rebecca McIlwaine vs Susan Canetto / Whitney Baylor6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Emily Marle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Jennifer Loehr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Colette Laporte
published 3
2.74
Kelly Goodnough
published
2.73
Rebecca McIlwaine
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.66
Ginny Crise
published
2.59
Karen Allaire
published
Jennifer Ranum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Loehr + Emily Marle10070% games+9.5% vs expected
Rebecca McIlwaine + Jennifer Loehr8655% games+9.3% vs expected
Ginny Crise + Karen Allaire3254% games+4.8% vs expected
Karen Allaire + Kelly Goodnough4947% games−2.3% vs expected
Jennifer Ranum + Karen Allaire0534% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca McIlwaine + Emily Marle404 matchesnot enough data
Ginny Crise + Jennifer Ranum123 matchesnot enough data
Ginny Crise + Kelly Goodnough033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Marle
87W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
3
Jennifer Loehr
70W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Colette Laporte
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Goodnough
14W–28L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Rebecca McIlwaine
82W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Ginny Crise
15W–21L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Karen Allaire
19W–26L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
Jennifer Ranum
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.