Teams

MTS: Burak

2023 NH Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men Winter · 3.0 Men 1

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-25vs YMCA:TappinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMatthew Zanderigo / Richard Beffa vs Ravi Vadali / Jeffrey Tappin6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAlper Gurses vs Albert So4-6, 0-6
2023-03-11vs YMCA:TappinWon 30
W#1 DoublesJayson Burak / Joe Stanieich-Burke vs Joe Martin / William Mortimer6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAlper Gurses vs Jeffrey Tappin6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRyan Bailey / Richard Beffa vs Mike Pagliuca / Ravi Vadali6-3, 6-0
2023-02-25vs YMCA:TappinWon 20
W#1 DoublesJayson Burak / Joe Stanieich-Burke vs William Mortimer / Mike Pagliuca7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Carter / Scott Schaier vs Richard Ouellette / Ravi Vadali6-2, 6-2
2023-02-11vs YMCA:TappinWon 20
W#1 DoublesJayson Burak / Joe Stanieich-Burke vs Joe Martin / Jeffrey Tappin6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRick Hafey / Scott Schaier vs Richard Ouellette / Mike Pagliuca6-2, 6-4
2023-01-28vs YMCA:TappinWon 20
W#1 DoublesJayson Burak / Joe Stanieich-Burke vs Joe Martin / Albert So7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Carter / Rick Hafey vs Richard Ouellette / Ravi Vadali6-4, 6-4
2023-01-15vs YMCA:TappinWon 21
W#1 DoublesJayson Burak / Joe Stanieich-Burke vs Joe Martin / Ravi Vadali6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMatthew Zanderigo vs Richard Ouellette6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRick Hafey / Scott Schaier vs Mike Pagliuca / Albert So4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MTS: Burak0614410109
2YMCA:Tappin0641428195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Matthew Zanderigo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.92
Rick Hafey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Alper Gurses
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.51
Jayson Burak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Joe Stanieich-Burke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Carter
published
Richard Beffa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Scott Schaier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jayson Burak + Joe Stanieich-Burke5070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Zanderigo
40W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Rick Hafey
21W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Alper Gurses
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Jayson Burak
48W–77L career · 5 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
Joe Stanieich-Burke
8W–0L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Carter
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Beffa
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Schaier
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.