Teams

MO - Moore/Mathison

2026 Adult 18 & Over Men Winter - Mobile · 4.5 Men Winter

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-05vs MTC - Sands/WilliamsWon 40
W#1 DoublesCedric Nitz / Les Steiner vs Vincent Leo McZeek / Matthew Davis6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLuke Bedwell vs Jason Antoine6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJack Meador / Trey Hamlin vs Jeremy Tapper / Reggie Oyler6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBlake Stoddard vs Christian Coney6-1, 6-2
2026-02-25vs MTC - Sands/WilliamsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJack Meador / Les Steiner vs Larry Trice / Matthew Davis4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNicholas Anez vs Jason Antoine6-1, 6-1
2026-02-19vs MTC - Sands/WilliamsWon 31
W#1 DoublesMark Moore / Nicholas Anez vs Jeremy Tapper / TImothy McSpadden6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLes Steiner vs Jason Antoine6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCraig Campbell / Jacob Stokes vs Vincent Leo McZeek / Ben Lafargue0-1
L#2 SinglesChad Necaise vs Kenny Sands0-1
2026-02-07vs MTC - Sands/WilliamsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Moore / Charles Mathison vs Ben Lafargue / Reggie Oyler6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTrey Hamlin vs Kenny Sands6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesChanning Townshend vs Christian Coney6-0, 6-0
2026-01-31vs MTC - Sands/WilliamsWon 40
W#1 DoublesCedric Nitz / Les Steiner vs Vincent Leo McZeek / Jerry Dyess6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJacob Stokes vs Ben Lafargue6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCraig Campbell / Mark Moore vs Larry Trice / Reggie Oyler6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJack Meador vs Jason Antoine6-0, 6-3
2026-01-23vs MTC - Sands/WilliamsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharles Mathison / Craig Campbell vs Kenny Sands / Jerry Dyess6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesWilliam Hooper vs Vincent Leo McZeek6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCedric Nitz vs Jason Antoine6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men Winter
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MO - Moore/Mathison60282684
2MTC - Sands/Williams0622856334

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Cedric Nitz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.42
Craig Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.37
Jacob Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.36
Jack Meador
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Blake Stoddard
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Channing Townshend
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Charles Mathison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Les Steiner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.97
Chad Necaise
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Luke Bedwell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Nicholas Anez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Trey Hamlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
William Hooper
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jack Meador + Les Steiner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cedric Nitz
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
4.42
4.5
Craig Campbell
11W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
4.42
Jacob Stokes
9W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
4.37
Jack Meador
15W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
4.36
4.5
Blake Stoddard
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Channing Townshend
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Charles Mathison
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Les Steiner
22W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Chad Necaise
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.97
Luke Bedwell
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nicholas Anez
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Trey Hamlin
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Hooper
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.