Teams

WTC - Poston 40 & Over 4.0,3.5,3.0

2026 Dothan USTA Tri-Level 40 & Over · Tri-Level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-03vs DO - LiuLost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Gonzalez / Jenny Nelson vs Sandra Danford / Carlene Sessions5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBay Chapman / Katie Lewis vs Katrina Leadbetter / Sandee Brookins4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Nelson / Allison Edwards vs Leigh Cooper / Carlene Sessions4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Lewis / Ashley Barron vs Katrina Leadbetter / NANCY MORRISS2-6, 4-6
2026-07-16vs DO - LiuLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Gonzalez / Nicole Langford vs Angie Adams / Jennifer Whittle5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Bitney / Helen Mendheim vs Carie Crowley / Angela Bell3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Beverly Shields
published 4
3.31
Helen Mendheim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Margaret Poston
published
2.90
Allison Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Katie Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Vicki Bitney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Jenny Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Ashley Barron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.48
Bay Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Nicole Langford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Edwards + Jenny Nelson2354% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Barron + Katie Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beverly Shields
10W–0L career · no lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Helen Mendheim
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Margaret Poston
19W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Allison Edwards
14W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Katie Lewis
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Vicki Bitney
4W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.86
Jenny Nelson
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
2.5
Ashley Barron
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
0%34%66%
2.55
2.5
Bay Chapman
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
Nicole Langford
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.