Teams

JOHNSON RANCH CW7.5B

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-08-30vs BROADSTONE RC CW7.5CLost 12
W#1 DoublesLauren Meegan / Barbara Sanchez vs Denise Chisick / Maureen Snyder6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMcKenzie Helvick / Nicole Roseveare vs Mary Heller / Linda Mcclain2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Fitzpatrick / Natalie Chang vs Jeanne Ferrell / Brianna Schneider3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
McKenzie Helvick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Carolyn Blythe
published 4.5
3.85
Ronnie Yamanaka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Terry Sandoval
published
3.75
Lisa Fitzpatrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Lisa Miyashiro
published
3.71
Staci Ross
published
3.69
Pamela Russo
published
3.67
Lauren Meegan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Jennifer Ryder
published
3.61
Christine Hatch
published 4
3.54
Caryn Wong
published 3.5
3.49
Barbara Sanchez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Natalie Chang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Caroline Duong-Tran
published 3.5
3.25
Nicole Roseveare
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Catherine Webster
published 3.5
3.17
Lori Grbac
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

McKenzie Helvick + Carolyn Blythe3454% games+3.5% vs expected
Staci Ross + Lisa Miyashiro4449% games+3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

McKenzie Helvick
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Carolyn Blythe
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.93
Ronnie Yamanaka
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
Terry Sandoval
19W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Lisa Fitzpatrick
16W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Lisa Miyashiro
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Staci Ross
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
Pamela Russo
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Lauren Meegan
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Jennifer Ryder
21W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.66
4
Christine Hatch
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Caryn Wong
21W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Barbara Sanchez
11W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Natalie Chang
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Caroline Duong-Tran
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Nicole Roseveare
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Catherine Webster
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Grbac
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.