Teams

A40 4.0M WR Krenn

2026 NEOTA Adult 40 & Over · NEOTA A40&O 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-14vs A40 4.0M MV1 GauLost 12
W#1 DoublesEric van Airsdale / Ryan Hannan vs Christopher Downing / GAUTAM PATHAK6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCharles Manak vs Yuri Borsch1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesQuinton Massey / Richard Stein vs Bruce Bensimone / Seth Vilensky4-6, 4-6
2026-07-07vs A40 4.0M MV2 SmithLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Genos / Eric van Airsdale vs Jim Batchik / Akin Fashina1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCharles Manak vs Jinu Hwang6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesQuinton Massey / David Terbeek vs Phong Nguyen / Andre Guzman2-6, 0-6
2026-06-30vs A40 4.0M LT KeresztesLost 05
L#1 DoublesPhilip Dubsky / Jeffrey Genos vs Michael Tolva / Myrle Sieger2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDoug Sachtleben vs Willard Greenwood2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCharles Manak / Eric van Airsdale vs Lion Moeliono / Stephen Radachi1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesQuinton Massey / David Terbeek vs Steve Simone / Michael Rose3-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesRichard Stein / Timothy Krenn vs Norm Loescher / Paul Mitnick3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-23vs A40 4.0M WE FrankfortLost 04
L#1 DoublesPhilip Dubsky / Ryan Hannan vs Sonny Kwon / Martin Laidler2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDoug Sachtleben vs Peter Frankfort7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTimothy Krenn / David Terbeek vs Ken Webster / Robert Siebenschuh1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Genos / Charles Manak vs Patrick Tobler / Ryan Niehenke1-6, 3-6
2026-06-16vs A40 4.0M CRC BudgenWon 21
L#1 DoublesPhilip Dubsky / Ryan Hannan vs Peter Bullen / Richard Haber6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDoug Sachtleben vs Marc Estafanous7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Genos / Charles Manak vs Vinicius Esteves / David Saltzman7-6, 6-3
2026-06-09vs A40 4.0M MV1 GauWon 32
W#1 DoublesPhilip Dubsky / Richard Stein vs GAUTAM PATHAK / Ken Gustafson6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBernard Laryea vs Yuri Borsch6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRyan Hannan / Charles Manak vs Bruce Bensimone / Ki Mixon3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Terbeek / Jeffrey Genos vs Brad Gerber / Krishna Neelakanta7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesTimothy Krenn / Robert Hoffman vs Jack Gau / Christopher Downing6-4, 6-2
2026-06-02vs A40 4.0M MV2 SmithLost 14
L#1 DoublesRyan Hannan / Philip Dubsky vs Phong Nguyen / Timothy Jones3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBernard Laryea vs Omar Baez Coronel6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCharles Manak / Robert Hoffman vs Keith Brady / Edmond Manuel1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Genos / David Terbeek vs Andrew Albrecht / Jim Batchik2-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesQuinton Massey / Timothy Krenn vs Gerald King / Eric Mock0-6, 1-6
2026-05-26vs A40 4.0M LT KeresztesLost 04
L#1 DoublesRichard Stein / Jeffrey Genos vs Michael Keresztes / Michael Tolva0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBernard Laryea vs Christopher Bolinger5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCharles Manak / Doug Sachtleben vs Willard Greenwood / Lion Moeliono4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTimothy Krenn / Robert Hoffman vs Paul Mitnick / Norm Loescher4-6, 1-6
2026-05-20vs A40 4.0M WE FrankfortLost 14
L#1 DoublesRyan Hannan / Eric van Airsdale vs Martin Laidler / Ken Webster2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCharles Manak vs Peter Frankfort1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPhilip Dubsky / Jeffrey Genos vs Mark Weiskind / James Pruce6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Stein / Doug Sachtleben vs VLAD VOLKOV / Ryan Niehenke6-7, 2-6
L#4 DoublesTimothy Krenn / David Terbeek vs Patrick Tobler / Robert Siebenschuh0-6, 2-6
2026-05-12vs A40 4.0M CRC BudgenWon 41
L#1 DoublesDoug Sachtleben / Richard Stein vs Rick Doody / Michael Doris6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBernard Laryea vs Marc Estafanous6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Hannan / Eric van Airsdale vs Leonard Pagon / Dave Wolf7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPhilip Dubsky / Charles Manak vs Sergio Thal / Leonard Kichler6-1, 6-4
W#4 DoublesTimothy Krenn / Jeffrey Genos vs Alan Hochheiser / Jim Bright6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · NEOTA A40&O 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A40 4.0M LT Keresztes9145521305
2A40 4.0M MV2 Smith91401024288
3A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak82371333374
4A40 4.0M NC Otto73341641379
5A40 4.0M MM Burnoski64292146396
6A40 4.0M PW Plymak64262458462
7A40 4.0M WE Frankfort55272349403
8A40 4.0M PM1 Harmon37153574528
9A40 4.0M MV1 Gau37153574480
10A40 4.0M WR Krenn37153574509
11A40 4.0M CRC Budgen1984289589
12A40 4.0M AO Wissmann01094185556

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Philip Dubsky
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.82
Eric van Airsdale
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Doug Sachtleben
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.63
Ryan Hannan
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.58
Jeffrey Genos
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Bernard Laryea
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.46
Richard Stein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published
3.45
David Terbeek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Timothy Krenn
usually #4 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.42
Quinton Massey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Charles Manak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4
Robert Hoffman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Manak + David Terbeek2443% games+3.9% vs expected
Eric van Airsdale + Ryan Hannan221453% games−2.0% vs expected
David Terbeek + Jeffrey Genos4646% games−6.5% vs expected
Charles Manak + Jeffrey Genos2447% gamesnot enough data
Quinton Massey + David Terbeek1438% gamesnot enough data
Timothy Krenn + Jeffrey Genos134 matchesnot enough data
Richard Stein + Doug Sachtleben044 matchesnot enough data
Philip Dubsky + Jeffrey Genos224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philip Dubsky
47W–37L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.98
4
Eric van Airsdale
72W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Doug Sachtleben
42W–67L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.70
Ryan Hannan
70W–73L career · 7 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.63
Jeffrey Genos
28W–42L career · 9 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Bernard Laryea
20W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.57
Richard Stein
2W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.46
4
David Terbeek
45W–71L career · 6 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.45
Timothy Krenn
28W–50L career · 7 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.42
Quinton Massey
13W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.42
4
Charles Manak
46W–89L career · 10 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.38
Robert Hoffman
2W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.