Teams

Jou

2022 One Doubles · 4.5 Men

3 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Seiji Okumura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Eric Furuya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Austin Jou
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Results8 ties
2022-08-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Furuya / Austin Jou vs Michael Laport / Max Bernstein7-5, 6-4
2022-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesAustin Jou / Seiji Okumura vs John Bard / Jordan Burns3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Furuya / Seiji Okumura vs Kasi Muthu / Brenden Anderson6-3, 6-3
2022-07-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAustin Jou / Seiji Okumura vs Matt Simmering / Eric Lee6-2, 6-4
2022-07-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSeiji Okumura / Eric Furuya vs Nathan Austin / Brendan Cunningham6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAustin Jou / Eric Furuya vs Andrew Nilsson / Frank Lippy6-1, 6-4
2022-07-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAustin Jou / Eric Furuya vs Daniel Larsen / Frank Lippy4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesAustin Jou / Eric Furuya vs Luke Filose / Justin Shull6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Seiji Okumura
22W–20L career
not enough data
4.5
Eric Furuya
17W–42L career
17%83%0%
4.03
4.5
Austin Jou
11W–45L career
26%74%0%
3.97

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.