Teams

Murphy, Susan

2022 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 7.0 Combo - Women - 55

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-10vs Kochersperger, CindyWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Murphy / Dawn Forst vs Beth Caffrey / Mary Weaver4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Robinson / Sheila Goins vs Lynn Looloian / Julie Drake2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDebra Don / Caryl Rieckman vs Natalie Gillaspie / Janet Crawford6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-25vs Meigs, BarbaraLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Miller / Mary Ball vs Susan McConkey / Marly McMillen3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Murphy / Lynn Sestak vs Chris Westermajer / Cathie Hopkins6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSheila Goins / Caryl Rieckman vs Kathy Bazzell / Mary Sizoo1-6, 5-7
2022-06-18vs Loepp, KathyWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Robinson / Susan Murphy vs Diane Freeman / Kathy Loepp6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnn Curtis / Sheila Goins vs Janet Beasing / Patty Jensen6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLynn Sestak / Teresa Lilek vs Marilynn Wright / Brenda Kirwin6-1, 6-4
2022-06-11vs Ferguson, SusanWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Miller / Angela Hagen vs Cindy Famuliner / Gloria Dewey4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Murphy / Ann Curtis vs Susan Ferguson / Beth Mundhenke6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Erickson / Caryl Rieckman vs Monica Pemberton / Virginia Davis6-4, 6-2
2022-06-04vs HOA/Herman/55&Over7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Murphy / Lynn Sestak vs Angel Krishna / Theresa Danforth Costello3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDawn Forst / Wendy Robinson vs Lynne Ornduff / Marcia Moroney2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Miller / Sheila Goins vs Karen Rogers / Stephanie Gunderson4-6, 3-6
2022-05-21vs OConnor,KellyLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Ball / Dawn Forst vs Maryalice Williams / Marilyn Keller6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Erickson / Debra Don vs Kelly OConnor / Sherri Jackson1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAngela Hagen / Teresa Lilek vs Mary Fendler / Irvilene Gardner6-1, 6-4
2022-05-14vs Harkleroad, IreneWon 30
W#1 DoublesDawn Forst / Mary Ball vs Irene Harkleroad / Natalie Neal6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebra Don / Lisa Erickson vs Sharon Altman / Donetta Shaner6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Kitts / Ann Curtis vs Keyna Chertoff / Connie Skeens6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 Combo - Women - 55
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Herman/55&Over7.0W6116512156
2OConnor,Kelly5213821189
3Murphy, Susan4313820178
4Loepp, Kathy3491227205
5Ferguson, Susan2571429201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Lynn Sestak
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Ann Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Karen Luchinsky
published
3.18
Dawn Forst
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Wendy Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Angela Hagen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Susan Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Sheila Goins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Nancy Kitts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Caryl Rieckman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Debra Don
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Erickson
published
Mary Ball
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Teresa Lilek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Kitts + Susan Murphy3550% games+15.6% vs expected
Lynn Sestak + Mary Ball15660% games+9.0% vs expected
Ann Curtis + Nancy Kitts3554% games+2.5% vs expected
Wendy Robinson + Dawn Forst71246% games−3.3% vs expected
Teresa Lilek + Dawn Forst4254% gamesnot enough data
Susan Murphy + Lynn Sestak134 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Goins + Susan Murphy123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Luchinsky + Susan Murphy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Sestak
72W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Ann Curtis
40W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
Karen Luchinsky
88W–92L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Dawn Forst
30W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Wendy Robinson
57W–78L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Angela Hagen
49W–86L career · 2 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Susan Murphy
102W–170L career · 5 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Sheila Goins
72W–123L career · 4 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
Nancy Kitts
38W–91L career · 1 line in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.96
Caryl Rieckman
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Debra Don
24W–84L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Erickson
27W–30L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Ball
76W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Teresa Lilek
21W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.