Teams

Al.Kovacs18C

2026 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.81 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-27vs Da.Rusnak18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesTaryn Backus / Lauren Kilpatrick vs Lori Stevens / Nadia Dahir6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShannon Marconi / Lee Schneider vs Dawn Rusnak / Kathy Estrada6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Murphy / Veda Bynum vs Kimberly Roth / Brittany Shumaker6-0, 6-0
2026-08-20vs Je.Glennon18C5.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Sijon / Lee Schneider vs Victoria Sumbs / Kathleen Malik6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Viele / Krista Heller vs Marlet Edwards / Jordan Barratt7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Harper / Taryn Backus vs Jessica Glennon / Josie Tattersall6-4, 7-5
2026-08-13vs Je.Jones18CLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela Myers / Lee Schneider vs Jessica Jones / MaryAdelaide Riddick6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMadison Sijon / Veda Bynum vs Rachel Roberson / Lauren Warren6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmanda Viele / Krista Heller vs Cara Pierce / Katie Fielitz6-3, 6-2
2026-08-06vs Me.McCaskill18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Kovacs / Lauren Kilpatrick vs Katherine Teague / Helen Morisey7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Flores / Emily Murphy vs Bess Pitt / Kristen Patch4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKerry Offterdinger / Angela Myers vs Meredith McCaskill / CarolAnn Wiggs3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-30vs Ca.Aden18CWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Kovacs / Lee Schneider vs Ashley Whited / Caroline Williams Aden7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMadison Sijon / Ann Flores vs Sarah Hill / Geri Russell2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesShannon Marconi / Lauren Kilpatrick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings31 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Je.Jones18C40931099
2Cl.Owens18C3081246
3Sp.Busby18C3081354
4St.Styers18C3081359
5Ta.Yasin18C5.53090554
6Al.Kovacs18C3193993
7La.Gillenwater18C2051245
8Ca.Aden18C2163665
9Je.Tyndall18C2172771
10Au.Beam18C2154864
11Da.Rusnak18C2163871
12El.Schacht18C2163980
13La.Holderness18C21541081
14As.Burnham18C226615121
15Am.Cantando18C1133642
16We.Bargoil18C1133648
17Sa.Fitzpatrick18C1133749
18Pa.Spell18C1124852
19Je.SagalSolomon18C12451291
20St.Fogarty18C5.512361285
21Al.Smith18C12361390
22El.Robinson18C122715101
23Ja.Stephan18C0224856
24La.Kane18C5.502151071
25Co.Hicks18C02151167
26Me.Dougher18C5.502151168
27Ch.Hyde18C02151164
28Ki.Roberts18C02151170
29Me.McCaskill18C03271490
30Al.Shipe18C030918111
31Je.Glennon18C5.50401224137

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Taryn Backus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.05
Alexandra Kovacs
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Madison Sijon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Tina McIntyre
published
2.59
Shannon Marconi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.56
Lee Schneider
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.51
Lauren Kilpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Ann Flores
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.40
Amanda Viele
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.36
Veda Bynum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.33
Kerry Offterdinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.23
Krista Heller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.12
Diana Harper
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veda Bynum + Lee Schneider213 matchesnot enough data
Alexandra Kovacs + Lee Schneider303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Taryn Backus
68W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Alexandra Kovacs
29W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Madison Sijon
16W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Tina McIntyre
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Shannon Marconi
46W–46L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
Lee Schneider
14W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
Lauren Kilpatrick
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%46%54%
2.51
2.5
Ann Flores
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.40
3
Amanda Viele
6W–5L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
2.5
Veda Bynum
44W–70L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
Kerry Offterdinger
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Krista Heller
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Diana Harper
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.