Teams

SS-H BLUE

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-06vs CACM TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Fry / Michelle Lockwood vs Kristin Nelson / Mary Deluccia3-6, 6-7
2024-07-30vs HRCA-N REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Fry / Carmen Harrington vs Sandy Stocker / Carmel Walz4-6, 4-6
2024-07-23vs LTFC ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Lockwood / Carmen Harrington vs Brooke Babington / Celine Ormond2-6, 1-6
2024-07-16vs HW BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Fry / Michelle Lockwood vs Sophia Burke / Krissie Marotto6-4, 6-1
2024-07-09vs WC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Fry / Carmen Harrington vs Emily Lewis / CC Dick6-1, 7-5
2024-07-02vs CACM TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarmen Harrington / Michelle Lockwood vs Mary Deluccia / Deborah Alper2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-25vs HRCA-N REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarmen Harrington / Michelle Lockwood vs Sandy Stocker / Carmel Walz1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Lynn Price
published
3.28
Laura Fry
published
3.17
Michelle Lockwood
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Carmen Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Jennifer Ramsey
published
3.06
Tracy Corbett
published
3.02
Maria Bales
published 3.5
Lisa Zook
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Zook + Lynn Price9262% games+5.6% vs expected
Michelle Lockwood + Carmen Harrington81149% games+0.7% vs expected
Maria Bales + Laura Fry7749% games−2.7% vs expected
Laura Fry + Lynn Price3453% games−11.7% vs expected
Maria Bales + Carmen Harrington6162% gamesnot enough data
Maria Bales + Michelle Lockwood213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Price
24W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
Laura Fry
22W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Michelle Lockwood
68W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Carmen Harrington
56W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Jennifer Ramsey
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Tracy Corbett
21W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
3.5
Maria Bales
55W–56L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Lisa Zook
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.