Teams

HOF: Black

2021 RI TRI Level · 3.0 Women 1

4 players · average NTRP 3.25 / RHODE ISLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2020-11-29vs CC: CowanWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Black / Tabatha Ashton vs Michelle Russo / Jennifer Stern6-2, 6-2
2020-11-28vs RP: StraussbergerWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Braman / Tabatha Ashton vs Pamela Tarro / Andrea Cheli6-1, 6-0
2020-11-22vs CC: Baby Got Backhand/SloanWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Braman / Tabatha Ashton vs Jody Tanzman / Alice Kim1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2020-11-21vs CC: McVayWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Black / Rebecca Braman vs Francine McVay / Karen Morrone6-2, 6-1
2020-11-15vs CC: CowanWon 10
W#1 DoublesTabatha Ashton / Ellen Lopresti vs Kim Cowan / Michelle Russo6-2, 6-3
2020-11-14vs CC: McVayWon 10
W#1 DoublesTabatha Ashton / Rebecca Braman vs Karen Morrone / Amy Dressler6-1, 6-3
2020-11-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTabatha Ashton / Rachel Hill vs Caroline Ceceri / Leslie Beaulieu3-6, 2-6
2020-10-25vs RP: StraussbergerWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Black / Rebecca Braman vs Pamela Tarro / Giselle Straussberger6-2, 6-1
2020-10-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesTabatha Ashton / Rachel Hill vs Paula Araujo / Angela Miller6-3, 6-0
2020-10-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesEllen Lopresti / Rebecca Braman vs Shelley Berger / Diane Donovan7-5, 6-1
2020-10-18vs CC: Berger/OdessaWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Black / Rebecca Braman vs Tina Odessa / Diane Donovan6-1, 6-3
2020-10-03vs CC: Baby Got Backhand/SloanLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Lopresti / Gina Black vs Deborah Robertson / Alice Kim4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Tabatha Ashton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Gina Black
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Ellen Lopresti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Rebecca Braman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Lopresti + Gina Black10559% games−1.6% vs expected
Gina Black + Rebecca Braman6075% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Lopresti + Rebecca Braman404 matchesnot enough data
Tabatha Ashton + Rebecca Braman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tabatha Ashton
48W–50L career · 7 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Gina Black
46W–19L career · 5 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Ellen Lopresti
56W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%55%44%
2.98
Rebecca Braman
45W–8L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.