Teams

Kennamer

2025 Southern Combo Doubles 18 & Over - HSV · 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-15vs HU 6.5W 18 & Over (Brackett)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEmma Picaro / Jenny Kennamer vs Mary Katharine Payne / Abby Bridges5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Wasley / Amy Rodriguez-Feo vs Amanda Flood / Yolanda Epp7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCristin Liveoak / Jennifer Brinkley vs Meleah Ellis / Nilmini Thompson1-6, 2-6
2025-09-10vs Yragui 6.5 2025Won 30
W#1 DoublesEmma Picaro / Cristin Liveoak vs Sabrina Hammond / Bonnie Powers6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKimberley Loomis / Melissa Jose vs Katherine Vinson / Susan Jensen6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Rodriguez-Feo / Jennifer Brinkley vs Beth Bryant / Michele Thomas6-1, 6-4
2025-08-28vs HU 6.5W 18 & Over (Brackett)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEmma Picaro / Jenny Kennamer vs Mary Katharine Payne / Abby Bridges5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Haney / Michelle Roth vs Nicole Cole / Yolanda Epp4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMadison Swegles / Amy Rodriguez-Feo vs Victoria Linson / Katelyn Smith6-3, 6-2
2025-08-17vs Yragui 6.5 2025Won 20
W#1 DoublesJenny Kennamer / Sarah Haney vs Beth Bryant / Sabrina Hammond6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Brinkley / Kimberley Loomis vs Jennifer Kelly / Tina Yragui6-1, 6-1
2025-08-12vs HU 6.5W 18 & Over (Brackett)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJenny Kennamer / Madison Swegles vs Abby Bridges / Mary Katharine Payne4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Wasley / Michelle Roth vs Victoria Linson / Yolanda Epp5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKimberley Loomis / Joy Watson vs Nicole Cole / Katelyn Smith0-6, 2-6
2025-08-04vs Yragui 6.5 2025Won 30
W#1 DoublesJenny Kennamer / Emma Picaro vs Jennifer Helton / Susan Jensen6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKimberley Loomis / Melissa Jose vs Tina Yragui / Beth Bryant6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Brinkley / Cristin Liveoak vs Pamela Crook / Jacqui Bianca7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Emma Picaro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Sarah Haney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Amy Rodriguez-Feo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Cristin Liveoak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Madison Swegles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Lauren Wasley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Melissa Jose
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Joy Watson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Andrea Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Jennifer Brinkley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Kimberley Loomis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Jenny Kennamer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Michelle Roth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Watson + Emma Picaro5067% games+17.2% vs expected
Cristin Liveoak + Emma Picaro4165% games+8.2% vs expected
Madison Swegles + Mary-Elizabeth Reinhart4261% games+4.5% vs expected
Jenny Kennamer + Emma Picaro7455% games+1.8% vs expected
Jennifer Brinkley + Cristin Liveoak2351% games+1.4% vs expected
Kimberley Loomis + Michelle Roth71342% games−3.6% vs expected
Kimberley Loomis + Jennifer Brinkley2349% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Wasley + Jenny Kennamer224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emma Picaro
47W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Sarah Haney
38W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.59
3.5
Amy Rodriguez-Feo
55W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Cristin Liveoak
46W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Madison Swegles
33W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
Lauren Wasley
27W–38L career · 10 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Melissa Jose
115W–100L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Joy Watson
25W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Andrea Stewart
56W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Brinkley
27W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.94
Kimberley Loomis
79W–96L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jenny Kennamer
24W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.88
Michelle Roth
27W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.64
Mary-Elizabeth Reinhart
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.