Teams

TDC Long

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-20vs Westwood WatkinsLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Collier / Susan Long vs Barbara Copley / Colleen Quinn6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-15vs Burkwood JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheri Carlyle / Heidi Collier vs Cynthia Muncy / Lynne Read2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-13vs Three Chopt DeValkWon 10
W#2 DoublesHeidi Collier / Kumiko Suzuki vs Emily Gravitt / Jane Sisk6-2, 6-2
2022-07-06vs MTC HilbertLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Long / Heidi Collier vs Kati Shick / Melissa Miller2-6, 6-7
2022-06-29vs ACAC Cheatham / HoeferWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Collier / Lori Davis vs Jennifer Funk / Trisha Smith6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Heidi Collier
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Laura Wheeler
published
3.17
Cynthia Mistretta
published 3.5
3.14
Sheri Carlyle
published
3.12
Meigan Sullivan
published
3.05
Michele Limoges
published
3.02
Annette Vignone
published 3.5
2.89
Kumiko Suzuki
published
2.87
Eliza Causey
published 3
2.70
Becky Harper
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheri Carlyle + Heidi Collier4162% games+8.1% vs expected
Meigan Sullivan + Laura Wheeler3453% games−3.5% vs expected
Sheri Carlyle + Michele Limoges123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heidi Collier
118W–82L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.36
Laura Wheeler
28W–18L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Cynthia Mistretta
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
Sheri Carlyle
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Meigan Sullivan
21W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%18%82%
3.12
Michele Limoges
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Annette Vignone
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
Kumiko Suzuki
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Eliza Causey
22W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Becky Harper
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.