Teams

2*SNewton-CHTC

2024 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Day

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-13Lost 01
L#3 SinglesYvonne Acker vs Michelle Trinco6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2024-06-29vs 1*MLong-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesAndy Blackburn vs Cecilia Edgar6-2, 6-1
2024-06-20vs 1*MLong-EnoLost 01
L#1 SinglesYvonne Acker vs Caroline Patzer3-6, 3-6
2024-06-08vs 1*MLong-EnoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAndy Blackburn vs Michelle Trinco4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesYvonne Acker vs Sheza Healey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-23vs 1*MLong-EnoWon 10
W#2 SinglesYvonne Acker vs Sheza Healey7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Amy Strong
published 3.5
3.44
Andy Blackburn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Joelle Permutt
published
3.18
Lynne Farber
published
3.17
Regina Davis
published
3.12
Jane Thrailkill
published
3.11
Yvonne Acker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Sheila Newton
published
3.05
Bailey Cook
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bailey Cook + Amy Strong303 matchesnot enough data
Amy Strong + Joelle Permutt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Strong
29W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Andy Blackburn
114W–90L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Joelle Permutt
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Lynne Farber
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Regina Davis
27W–45L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Jane Thrailkill
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Yvonne Acker
125W–166L career · 4 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sheila Newton
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Bailey Cook
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.