Teams

SWittek (Raintree)

2026 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-22vs CMiles (Park Road)Won 21
L#1 DoublesHilda Austin / Adriana Hall vs Loriann Summers / Barbara Clement5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Hallsten / Renee Ziemianski vs Jennifer Hall / Elizabeth Murphy6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStaci Wittek / Denise Dexter vs Luz Lim / Karen Lindquist6-4, 6-4
2026-04-08vs KLucas (Matthews)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Ackerlund / Lesly Carlton vs Victoria Sofarelli / Kimberley Pennington3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Dexter / Staci Wittek vs Angela MacMurphy / Zahide Marenic6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAdriana Hall / Laura Sullivan vs Pamela Quinn / Sherri Silvia6-1, 6-3
2026-04-01vs CMiles (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesStaci Wittek / Rona Karacaova vs Christine Miles / Brenda Jandebeur3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKaren Allen / Julie Ackerlund vs Cathy Cagney / Elizabeth Murphy6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Sullivan / Adriana Hall vs Barbara Clement / Jennifer Hall4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-18vs KLucas (Matthews)Won 21
W#1 DoublesStaci Wittek / Rona Karacaova vs Angela MacMurphy / Peggy Reimann6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Sullivan / Adriana Hall vs Kathy Lucas / Kimberley Pennington3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Hallsten / Renee Ziemianski vs Rhonda Tate / Sherri Silvia6-1, 6-2
2026-03-11vs CMiles (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesWinnie Simmons / Laura Sullivan vs Cathy Cagney / Christine Miles0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHilda Austin / Karen Allen vs Barbara Clement / Brenda Jandebeur6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStaci Wittek / Kimberlee Curley vs Elizabeth Murphy / Karen Lindquist6-2, 6-3
2026-02-25vs KLucas (Matthews)Won 21
L#1 DoublesHilda Austin / Karen Allen vs Angela MacMurphy / Peggy Reimann3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLesly Carlton / Adriana Hall vs Victoria Sofarelli / Kathy Lucas4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRenee Ziemianski / Julie Ackerlund vs Lisa Morgan / Pamela Quinn7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Renee Ziemianski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Staci Wittek
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Hilda Austin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Rona Karacaova
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Lesly Carlton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Adriana Hall
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Kimberlee Curley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Denise Dexter
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Julie Ackerlund
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Winnie Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rachel Hallsten
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Prochaska
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rona Karacaova + Staci Wittek3261% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Renee Ziemianski
16W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Staci Wittek
97W–96L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Hilda Austin
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Rona Karacaova
50W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Lesly Carlton
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Adriana Hall
8W–27L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Kimberlee Curley
46W–67L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Denise Dexter
5W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Julie Ackerlund
44W–54L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Winnie Simmons
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
2.54
Rachel Hallsten
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Prochaska
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.