Teams

Wyoming/Laubhan/55AdultW80

2026 USTA 55 & OVER · 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-28vs Wydaho ladiesLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Bush / Troy Ibarra vs Linda Merigliano / Priscilla Dressen7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDodi Campbell / Ellen Laubhan vs Amy Berkner / Aileen VanMeveren4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Moore / Ginger Paige vs Nancy Kepner / Jennifer Lloyd1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-28vs Wydaho ladiesWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnne Moore / Ginger Paige vs Amy Berkner / Aileen VanMeveren1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTroy Ibarra / Cheryl Johnson vs Priscilla Dressen / Linda Merigliano7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Buccino / Michelle Bush vs Diane McGee / Jennifer Lloyd6-4, 6-1
2026-06-27vs Wydaho ladiesLost 12
L#1 DoublesSharon Buccino / Ellen Laubhan vs Amy Berkner / Stephanie Roche5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Moore / Ginger Paige vs Nancy Kepner / Priscilla Dressen6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Johnson / Dodi Campbell vs Diane McGee / Jennifer Lloyd2-6, 3-6
2026-06-27vs Wydaho ladiesWon 21
L#1 DoublesCheryl Johnson / Dodi Campbell vs Amy Berkner / Aileen VanMeveren2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Bush / Ellen Laubhan vs Nancy Kepner / Priscilla Dressen6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTroy Ibarra / Sharon Buccino vs Diane McGee / Linda Merigliano6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wyoming/Laubhan/55AdultW80226613106
2Wydaho ladies226613108

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anne Moore
published 4.5
3.72
Dodi Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Ellen Laubhan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Michelle Bush
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Ginger Paige
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Sharon Buccino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Troy Ibarra
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Buccino + Ellen Laubhan4347% gamesnot enough data
Troy Ibarra + Anne Moore303 matchesnot enough data
Dodi Campbell + Ellen Laubhan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Moore
10W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Dodi Campbell
39W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Ellen Laubhan
128W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Michelle Bush
19W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Ginger Paige
27W–57L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Sharon Buccino
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Troy Ibarra
46W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.