Teams

Bondurant/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 5.0 18 & Over Women

5 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 12 9:00 AM
University Club Of Memphis
Sep 19 3:00 PM
Arlington Tennis Center
2026-08-29vs Cleveland/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesTerry Bondurant / Rachel Crawford vs Connie Clarkson / Michelle Corbin0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMj Halliburton / Kim Denbow vs Anna Claire Parker / Katie Gobbell3-6, 2-6
2026-08-22vs Franks/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesBarbara Wilson / Rachel Crawford vs Danielle Bartlett / Marcela Salvador6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKim Denbow / Jane Ashley Huey vs Margaret Reid / Jenni Harris5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTina David / Susan Reyna vs Suzanne Franks / Katy Kitchens0-6, 0-6
2026-08-18vs Justice/ MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesTerry Bondurant / Jane Ashley Huey vs Katie Howell / Amanda Nelson4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTina David / Julie Lewis vs Stewart Hunt / Rachel Veteto7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-15vs Blanton/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesRachel Crawford / Ashley Walker vs Shellie Eller / Abigail Cardwell7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Lewis / Kim Denbow vs Savannah Burton / Greer Moyes0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMeredith Edwards / Susan Reyna vs Krista Hendrix / Emma Dotson3-6, 3-6
2026-08-08vs Justice/ MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesBarbara Wilson / Terry Bondurant vs Kristin Frazier / Sarah Reed6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRachel Crawford / Jane Ashley Huey vs Laura Justice / Lisa Berryhill6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.52
Tina David
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Terry Bondurant
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.18
Rachel Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.00
Kim Denbow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
1.78
Susan Reyna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina David + Susan Reyna033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina David
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
Terry Bondurant
29W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Rachel Crawford
7W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Kim Denbow
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Susan Reyna
3W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.