Teams

PTC-Wagner/Tse

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Jeremy Chiang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Juan Arenas
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.22
Maharshi Chauhan
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Scott Tse
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Ruben Alaniz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.16
Jamil Panni
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Kevin Allen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Kevin Fleishman
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.04
Jared Wick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Seth Wagner
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
3.01
John Brady
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.99
Chu Wu
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jeremy Chiang
38W–21L career
0%89%11%
3.43
3.5
Juan Arenas
23W–32L career
0%93%7%
3.41
3.5
Maharshi Chauhan
9W–11L career · type S
2%98%0%
3.22
3.5
Scott Tse
40W–39L career · type A
2%98%0%
3.22
3
Ruben Alaniz
33W–23L career
0%33%67%
3.17
3.5
Jamil Panni
82W–59L career
5%95%0%
3.16
3.5
Kevin Allen
32W–23L career
11%89%0%
3.11
3
Kevin Fleishman
12W–13L career
0%61%39%
3.07
3.5
Jared Wick
2W–12L career
26%74%0%
3.04
3
Seth Wagner
51W–76L career
0%73%27%
3.03
3
John Brady
71W–76L career
0%81%19%
3.01
3.5
Chu Wu
19W–18L career
38%62%0%
2.99

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.