Teams

HWhite-UNC

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-19vs LCarlson-DFCWon 10
W#2 SinglesJenna Schreiber vs Dayna Kelly6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-11-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesCathy Joyce vs Elizabeth McNamara6-1, 7-5
2025-11-12vs MLong-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesCathy Joyce vs Devon Horine6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Alison Doherty6-0, 6-2
2025-11-05vs KPollak-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKate Elia vs Amber Cagle6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesHannah White vs Button Hall4-6, 2-6
2025-10-22vs CYu-DURWon 10
W#1 SinglesJenna Schreiber vs Anita Yang6-3, 6-3
2025-10-15vs LHabib-DURWon 20
W#2 SinglesKate Elia vs Katie Evans6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJenna Schreiber vs Lina Habib6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Cathy Joyce
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.84
Kate Elia
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.72
Jenna Schreiber
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4
3.58
Mary Jo Dunnington
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.48
Sarah Franks
published
3.27
Hannah White
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Franks + Hannah White4349% games−1.9% vs expected
Hannah White + Mary Jo Dunnington4156% gamesnot enough data
Cathy Joyce + Mary Jo Dunnington213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Joyce
124W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Kate Elia
44W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Jenna Schreiber
65W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Mary Jo Dunnington
256W–119L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
Sarah Franks
79W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Hannah White
87W–146L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.