Teams

Harrison/18s/3.0/SC Day

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Alexis Shih
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
Allison Harrison
published 3
2.60
Beth Erwin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.57
Catherine Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Erin Roy
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Hollie Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jacy Downing
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jeanne Saba
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Swett
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
Jenny Vitellaro
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Karie Tillman
usually #3 Doubles 65%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Farrow
published
Kristy Broussard
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lacey Schwab
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Megan Bucy
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Michelle Branighan
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Michelle Ricotta
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey Schwab + Erin Roy12366% gamesnot enough data
Megan Bucy + Jennifer Swett1441% gamesnot enough data
Kristy Broussard + Jenny Vitellaro4162% gamesnot enough data
Hollie Spencer + Jennifer Swett2351% gamesnot enough data
Lacey Schwab + Hollie Spencer224 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Schwab + Jenny Vitellaro213 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Schwab + Jennifer Swett303 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Davenport + Jenny Vitellaro213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexis Shih
14W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Allison Harrison
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Beth Erwin
6W–34L career · 24 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Catherine Davenport
6W–15L career · 10 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Erin Roy
28W–10L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hollie Spencer
8W–17L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacy Downing
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeanne Saba
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Swett
11W–17L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Vitellaro
20W–28L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karie Tillman
10W–21L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Farrow
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristy Broussard
15W–17L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lacey Schwab
40W–11L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Bucy
3W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Branighan
7W–17L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Ricotta
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.