Teams

LLAS UPTA65A/Cabot/Spindletree

65 & Over · 65 & Over LLAS - Women 9.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-13vs HHTL65/Nagy/ShipyardWon 21
W#1 DoublesPamela Cabot / Karen Penoncello vs Suzanne Gray / Julia White6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCindy Eleftheriou / Deb Galinsky vs Susie Peiffer / Nancy Carter1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Driscoll / Phyllis Bible vs Vicki Nagy / Janel McGinley4-3
2024-10-12vs HHTL65/Nagy/ShipyardLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Driscoll / Karen Penoncello vs Lori Bergmann / Mary Jackson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeb Galinsky / Pamela Cabot vs Deborah Hubbart / Cindy Vander Berg2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHilary Drammis / Linda Grubbs vs Suzanne Gray / Julia White2-6, 0-6
2024-10-12vs HHTL65/Nagy/ShipyardLost 03
L#1 DoublesPhyllis Bible / Linda Grubbs vs Susie Peiffer / Nancy Carter1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Eleftheriou / Janet Driscoll vs Deborah Hubbart / Cindy Vander Berg3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHilary Drammis / Karen Penoncello vs Janel McGinley / Priscilla Sisson4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over LLAS - Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Karen Penoncello
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Cindy Eleftheriou
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Pamela Cabot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Deb Galinsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Hilary Drammis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Driscoll
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Grubbs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Phyllis Bible
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Penoncello + Cindy Eleftheriou16558% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Penoncello
25W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Cindy Eleftheriou
30W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.75
Pamela Cabot
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.68
4
Deb Galinsky
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
Hilary Drammis
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Janet Driscoll
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Grubbs
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Phyllis Bible
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.