Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5B

2024 COMBO · Men 6.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Brian Hennessy
published 4
3.59
Jim Collins
published
3.39
Mark Joseph
published
3.31
Andrey Izmaylov
published 3.5
3.30
Sushil Rajendran
published
3.29
Lucas Askew
published
3.28
Anton Andreev
published 3.5
3.22
Shri Shrivas
published
3.15
Guru Prasad Acharya
published
2.85
Shiva Dixit
published
2.85
Tapas Panda
published
2.80
Dave Wong
published 3
2.76
Zain Saiyed
published
2.67
Pranit Kapadekar
published
2.59
Zhigang Wang
published
2.42
Steve Zalewski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tapas Panda + Shiva Dixit5168% games+25.7% vs expected
Mark Joseph + Jim Collins5074% games+7.9% vs expected
Guru Prasad Acharya + Sushil Rajendran033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Hennessy
32W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Jim Collins
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.59
Mark Joseph
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Andrey Izmaylov
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Sushil Rajendran
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Lucas Askew
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Anton Andreev
33W–31L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Shri Shrivas
0W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Guru Prasad Acharya
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Shiva Dixit
19W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Tapas Panda
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Dave Wong
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Zain Saiyed
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
2.76
Pranit Kapadekar
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Zhigang Wang
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
2.59
Steve Zalewski
1W–12L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.