← Teams

GFU-Garry

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Julie Bryan Maack
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
—
Patricia Evola
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
—
Sandy Garry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Sue Gregoire
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.06
Liz ODonnell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.06
Pam Edinger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.85
Janet Tabor
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.83
June Wu
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Results11 ties
2022-06-25Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesSandy Garry / Janet Tabor vs Jodi Landefeld / Monique Eldridge6-1, 6-2
2022-06-25Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesSandy Garry / Julie Bryan Maack vs Theresa Helland / Renee Peterson6-3, 6-2
2022-06-24Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJanet Tabor / Julie Bryan Maack vs Patricia Carow / Sue Schoettler6-1, 7-6
2021-11-21Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPam Edinger / Liz ODonnell vs Shannon Dilorenzo / Lori Layne6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSue Gregoire / Janet Tabor vs Amy Leahy / Elise Orban6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Anderson / Sandy Garry vs Stacy Hawkins Parker / Mary Jo Kallgren6-3, 6-2
2021-11-14Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesPatricia Evola / Sue Gregoire vs Anne McCroskey / Xia Wu6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Anderson / Janet Tabor vs Karen Sullivan / Launi Smith6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Bryan Maack / June Wu vs Kim Hill / Carol Woolman6-4, 6-3
2021-11-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPam Edinger / Sue Gregoire vs Tami Oglesby / Jill Sather6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Bryan Maack / June Wu vs Lisa Provost / Nenette Olson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatricia Evola / Janet Tabor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-10-31Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPam Edinger / Liz ODonnell vs Chiho Cronk / Rebecca Redding5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Evola / Sue Gregoire vs Julie Brown / Kimberly Quach6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Anderson / Sandy Garry vs Kelly Branson / Marie Picard6-2, 6-4
2021-10-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSandy Garry / June Wu vs Becky Rey / Jill Sather6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPam Edinger / Liz ODonnell vs Yumiko Pike / Tami Oglesby6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJanet Tabor / Sue Gregoire vs Deborah Borchers / Nenette Olson1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-10-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSandy Garry / June Wu vs Chiho Cronk / Rebecca Redding6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPatricia Evola / Sue Gregoire vs Kimberly Quach / Kelly Branson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Anderson / Julie Bryan Maack vs Julie Brown / Kelly Edwards6-1, 6-3
2021-09-12Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPam Edinger / Liz ODonnell vs Linda Fosberg / Bonnie Sidoff6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandy Garry / June Wu vs Linda Anderson / Kim Hill6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSue Gregoire / Janet Tabor vs Karen Sullivan / Carol Woolman6-1, 6-0
2021-09-11Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesSandy Garry / Mary Anderson vs Lori Layne / Jennifer Devoe6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPam Edinger / Liz ODonnell vs Amy Leahy / Elise Orban6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJulie Bryan Maack / Janet Tabor vs Trina Denson / Stacy Hawkins Parker6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Julie Bryan Maack
15W–15L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Patricia Evola
26W–12L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Sandy Garry
145W–81L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Sue Gregoire
120W–80L career
3%97%0%
4.11
4.5
Liz ODonnell
56W–24L career
7%93%0%
4.06
4.5
Pam Edinger
42W–30L career
9%91%0%
4.06
4.5
Janet Tabor
51W–28L career
52%48%0%
3.85
4.5
June Wu
148W–91L career
58%42%0%
3.83

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.