Teams

Some Strings Attached

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY · Ladies 3.5 18s

16 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-03-21vs Gin & DeuceLost 23
W#1 DoublesOlivia Devin / Kathy Noble vs Emily Bevan / Stephanie Nordhaus6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLiz Kweller vs Robin Kelly6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Caldwell / Loretta Charlton vs Jennifer Jones / Jody Kane2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Scott / Deborah Young vs Lara Dye / Adiena Bednarz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesFelicia Montgomery / Monica Rogers vs Beverly Crenshaw / Julie Searle7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-02-06vs Ace HolesWon 41
W#1 DoublesLori Golden / Michele Langley vs Ann Jerome / Rhonda Gum6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLiz Kweller vs Trudy Lee3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesOlivia Devin / Carole Kernohan vs Amy Herzog / Rhonda Hudson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLoretta Charlton / Mary Edwards vs Janice Johnson / Jennifer Zamiska6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesKaren Scott / Rebecca Stoian vs Helen Huckaba / Anna Beattie6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 3.5 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Adrienne Kendall
published 4.5
3.69
Esther Torres
published 4
3.44
Liz Kweller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.40
Karen Scott
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Kathy Noble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Lori Golden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Monica Rogers
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Loretta Charlton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Andrea Hudler
published 3.5
3.10
Carole Kernohan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Rebecca Stoian
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Nichole Owen
published
2.88
Roxanne Cossette
published
Debra Maxie
published
Lauren Kuen
published
Stacey Lundeen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Stoian + Lori Golden8161% games+5.4% vs expected
Liz Kweller + Andrea Hudler6161% games+5.3% vs expected
Monica Rogers + Andrea Hudler3648% games+1.8% vs expected
Rebecca Stoian + Karen Scott141250% games+0.5% vs expected
Monica Rogers + Karen Scott2351% games+0.1% vs expected
Karen Scott + Andrea Hudler4157% games−0.2% vs expected
Carole Kernohan + Karen Scott3255% games−0.2% vs expected
Esther Torres + Andrea Hudler3648% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adrienne Kendall
93W–46L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.13
4
Esther Torres
51W–46L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Liz Kweller
45W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Karen Scott
68W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Kathy Noble
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Lori Golden
46W–43L career · 1 line in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Monica Rogers
16W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Loretta Charlton
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Andrea Hudler
38W–56L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Carole Kernohan
16W–21L career · 1 line in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Rebecca Stoian
38W–21L career · 1 line in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Nichole Owen
19W–34L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Roxanne Cossette
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.88
Debra Maxie
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Kuen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacey Lundeen
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.