Teams

El.Speicher40A

2026 Capital Adult 40 & Over 5.0 · Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-14vs Ne.Day40ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Moler Glass / Jennifer McEntee vs Nena Marks / Karen Rothschild7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Danielle Wilder vs Michelle Ahlquist / Jennifer Reese3-6, 5-7
2026-05-07vs Ne.Day40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesNeal Goodwin / Kelly Moler Glass vs Michelle Ahlquist / Nena Marks3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer McEntee / Elizabeth Speicher vs Laura Alvarez / Jennifer Reese6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHeather Remley / Danielle Wilder vs Emily Perry / Jeni Burnette0-6, 1-6
2026-04-30vs Ne.Day40ALost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Remley / Neal Goodwin vs Sarah Barnhill / Nena Marks0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Moler Glass / Danielle Wilder vs Laura Alvarez / Jennifer Reese4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Speicher / Kelly Riely vs Jeni Burnette / Emily Perry1-6, 3-6
2026-04-23vs Ne.Day40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesBlair Risinger / Elizabeth Speicher vs Emily Perry / Jeni Burnette2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVirginia Jenkins / Anne Frautschi vs Nena Marks / Karen Rothschild4-6, 0-6
2026-04-16vs Ne.Day40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Riely / Heather Remley vs Michelle Ahlquist / Nena Marks5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKelly Moler Glass / Elizabeth Speicher vs Laura Alvarez / Jeni Burnette6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBlair Risinger / Danielle Wilder vs Bonnie Stabler / Karen Rothschild6-4, 6-3
2026-04-09vs Ne.Day40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Moler Glass / Jennifer McEntee vs Sarah Barnhill / Nena Marks0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Speicher / Danielle Wilder vs Alice Stubbs / Michelle Ahlquist0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Frautschi / Virginia Jenkins vs Bonnie Stabler / Jennifer Reese6-3, 7-5
2026-03-26vs Ne.Day40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesNeal Goodwin / Elizabeth Speicher vs Jeni Burnette / Emily Perry3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesHeather Remley / Danielle Wilder vs Jennifer Reese / Michelle Ahlquist3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ne.Day40A6115614163
2El.Speicher40A1661531220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.73
Anne Frautschi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.63
Kelly Moler Glass
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.54
Elizabeth Speicher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.50
Danielle Wilder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.42
Heather Remley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.39
Neal Goodwin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Blair Risinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Wilder + Heather Remley6358% games+2.9% vs expected
Danielle Wilder + Elizabeth Speicher0638% games−8.4% vs expected
Heather Remley + Kelly Moler Glass5059% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Speicher + Neal Goodwin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Anne Frautschi
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.73
5
Kelly Moler Glass
69W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
Elizabeth Speicher
12W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.54
5
Danielle Wilder
229W–112L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.50
5
Heather Remley
298W–153L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.42
Neal Goodwin
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.39
4.5
Blair Risinger
118W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.