Teams

The Nelson Club/Alexander-Gonzalez W3.5

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Heidi Moore
published 3.5
3.54
Vesna Gray
published
3.52
Heather Perkins
published 3.5
3.51
3.51
Chasti Gest
published 3.5
3.45
Denelle Alexander
published 3.5
3.39
Anne Givens
published 3.5
3.38
Aimee Rodriguez
published 3.5
3.36
Bonnie Black
published 3.5
3.35
Rachel Stoll
published
3.33
Silvia Tapia
published
3.30
Clare Holbrook
published 3.5
3.25
JoAnn Morley
published
Ainsley Pierce
published 3.5
3.24
Julie Harner
published
3.20
Beckey Fuller
published 3.5
3.16
Carolyn Strickfaden
published 3.5
3.12
Mandi Schmitz
published
3.02
Amber James
published 3
Kaitlyn Scott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vesna Gray + Clare Holbrook11659% games+8.9% vs expected
Heather Perkins + Blaine Eschenburg2450% games+7.2% vs expected
Chasti Gest + Anne Givens13559% games+2.2% vs expected
Blaine Eschenburg + Denelle Alexander19856% games−2.6% vs expected
Anne Givens + Silvia Tapia0734% games−10.9% vs expected
Denelle Alexander + Rachel Stoll3259% gamesnot enough data
Amber James + Julie Harner3251% gamesnot enough data
Anne Givens + Bonnie Black1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heidi Moore
34W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.72
Vesna Gray
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Heather Perkins
33W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
4
Blaine Eschenburg
34W–28L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Chasti Gest
49W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Denelle Alexander
35W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Anne Givens
39W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Aimee Rodriguez
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Bonnie Black
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Rachel Stoll
22W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
Silvia Tapia
16W–34L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Clare Holbrook
19W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
JoAnn Morley
10W–23L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ainsley Pierce
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Harner
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Beckey Fuller
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Carolyn Strickfaden
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
Mandi Schmitz
25W–17L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Amber James
24W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
Kaitlyn Scott
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.