Teams

Urban, Rick

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-10-08vs Kirsch, ScottLost 12
L#1 DoublesRavi Bhagat / BANGALORE DEEPAK vs Daniel Curley / Scott Kirsch3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Spears / Scott Bollinger vs Kris Chatrathi / Norman Friedman6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesScott Siemers / Abiodun Akinwuntan vs Henry Arst / James Dawkins4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-05-12vs Kirsch, ScottWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Bollinger / Nicholas Urban vs Daniel Curley / James Dawkins6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPaul Spears vs Benjamin Sheldon6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAbiodun Akinwuntan / BANGALORE DEEPAK vs Nikhil Parimi / Michael Graves5-7, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Paul Spears
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Scott Bollinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
BANGALORE DEEPAK
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Ravi Bhagat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Rick Urban
published
3.25
Nathan Gray
published
3.24
Abiodun Akinwuntan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Alan Turner
published
Greg Oborny
published
John Felski
published
Lucky Chawla
published
Nicholas Urban
published
Scott Siemers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Bollinger + Paul Spears5158% games−0.1% vs expected
Abiodun Akinwuntan + Scott Siemers3946% games−1.7% vs expected
Ravi Bhagat + BANGALORE DEEPAK1541% games−15.0% vs expected
Rick Urban + Scott Bollinger2346% gamesnot enough data
Scott Bollinger + Greg Oborny2347% gamesnot enough data
Rick Urban + Abiodun Akinwuntan134 matchesnot enough data
Rick Urban + BANGALORE DEEPAK044 matchesnot enough data
Rick Urban + Paul Spears314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Spears
57W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Scott Bollinger
46W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
BANGALORE DEEPAK
6W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.47
Ravi Bhagat
12W–32L career · 1 line in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.45
Rick Urban
9W–32L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
3.36
Nathan Gray
13W–32L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
Abiodun Akinwuntan
11W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Alan Turner
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Greg Oborny
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Felski
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lucky Chawla
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicholas Urban
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Siemers
15W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.