Teams

MacCall

2026 South East Tennis Singles 55 & Over League · 3.5 Men 55 & over

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-27vs Pelczar COMPASS POINTEWon 10
W#2 SinglesDoug MacCall vs Franklin Cassada5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-24vs Walker St. JamesWon 21
L#1 SinglesPaul Friedland vs Jeff Walker5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesDoug MacCall vs Donald Murphy1-0
W#3 SinglesSteven Kolb vs Timothy O'Connor1-0
2026-02-19vs Walker St. JamesLost 12
L#1 SinglesDavid Odell vs Jeff Walker7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesPaul Friedland vs Timothy O'Connor6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesBrian Grozbean vs Chip Yost5-7, 5-7
2026-02-07vs Kysely SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesDoug MacCall vs Gregor Kysely7-5, 7-5
W#2 SinglesDavid Odell vs Michael Caropolo6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesEdward Pringle vs Peter Weppler6-3, 6-1
2026-02-02vs Kysely SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesPaul Friedland vs Dale Benson1-0
W#2 SinglesDavid Odell vs Michael Caropolo6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesEdward Pringle vs Jim Crotty6-2, 6-3
2026-01-28vs Walker St. JamesWon 21
W#1 SinglesDavid Odell vs Donald Murphy7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDoug MacCall vs Jeff Walker6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesBrian Grozbean vs Kevin Daly2-6, 4-6
2026-01-26vs Pelczar COMPASS POINTEWon 30
W#1 SinglesSteven Kolb vs Tim Pelczar2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDoug MacCall vs Casey Carr7-6, 7-5
W#3 SinglesEdward Pringle vs David Paul6-4, 7-6
2026-01-17vs Pelczar COMPASS POINTEWon 21
W#1 SinglesPaul Friedland vs Franklin Cassada6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSteven Kolb vs Michael Hancock7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesDaniel Weese vs David Paul6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men 55 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Paul Friedland
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.51
David Odell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Doug MacCall
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.39
Steven Kolb
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.32
Edward Pringle
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Brian Grozbean
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Fred Broyles
published
3.00
Daniel Weese
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Friedland
15W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
David Odell
21W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Doug MacCall
39W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Steven Kolb
25W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Edward Pringle
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Brian Grozbean
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Fred Broyles
39W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
3.5
Daniel Weese
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.