Teams

RGildehaus-YMCA

2026 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-04vs AFreedman-HVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Jolly / Greg Fitts vs Chris Hamilton / Dempsey Smith7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDavid Holub vs Alex Herzick4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDan Dillon / Dan Robinson vs Paul Klenk / John Caccavale1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-27vs PBream-UNCLost 04
L#1 DoublesMax Lipshitz / Dan Robinson vs Grant Fulton / Ruchir Vora4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristian Basa vs Eric Shen2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChip Pope / David Holub vs David Margolis / Derek Saccoccio2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEdward Hennessey / Stephen Vanderhoof vs Peter Bream / James White0-6, 2-6
2026-04-20vs EFuguet-DFCLost 13
L#1 DoublesEd Holub / Ralph Gildehaus vs Christopher Johnston / Neill Goslin3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesEdward Bernier vs John StClair6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephen Vanderhoof / Edward Hennessey vs Evan Fuguet / Matthew Sears1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRicky Ayers / Chip Pope vs Donald Berger / Adam Rust1-6, 3-6
2026-04-13vs RHutchins-CHCCWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Holub / Scott Jolly vs Richard Woods / Jonathan Mills6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristian Basa vs Robert Hutchins1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMax Lipshitz / Dan Robinson vs Robert Esther / Matt Moody6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDan Dillon / Chip Pope vs Stephen Whilden / Toland Barfield6-2, 6-3
2026-03-27vs RMcGarrah-HRWon 31
W#1 DoublesCharlie Foster / Max Lipshitz vs Christopher Buccafusco / JEFF CHANDLER3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEdward Bernier vs Tim McMahon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDan Robinson / Stephen Vanderhoof vs Tom Petersen / Thomas Johnston4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRicky Ayers / Edward Hennessey vs Michael Klein / Rob McGarrah6-3, 6-3
2026-03-23vs JLockhead-HRLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristian Basa / Scott Jolly vs Steve Haine / JAMES MONTAGUE4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDan Robinson / Charlie Foster vs John Spurrell / Richard Griffin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRicky Ayers / Edward Hennessey vs Stephen Kennedy / John Lockhead2-6, 4-6
2026-03-03vs KRamaswamy-DURLost 04
L#1 DoublesEd Holub / David Holub vs Amit Sachan / Steven Harris6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEdward Bernier vs Madankumar Kannan3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristian Basa / Ralph Gildehaus vs Nitni Agrawal / Shiv Giri3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDan Dillon / Greg Fitts vs Brian Dorais / Chris Malory3-6, 4-6
2026-03-02vs AYoung-EVSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCharlie Foster / Chip Pope vs Arash Chehrazi / Carl Laird3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEd Holub vs Will Johnson6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Vanderhoof / Dan Robinson vs Robert Singagliese / Matthew Feldt6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMax Lipshitz / Dan Dillon vs Chris Reeves / Rick Edmunds0-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Ed Holub
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Max Lipshitz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
David Holub
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Stephen Vanderhoof
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Greg Fitts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Edward Bernier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Dan Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.26
Dan Dillon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Christian Basa
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Scott Jolly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Ralph Gildehaus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Chip Pope
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.83
Ricky Ayers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ed Holub + David Holub5166% games+11.5% vs expected
Scott Jolly + Greg Fitts404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ed Holub
78W–28L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Max Lipshitz
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
David Holub
16W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Stephen Vanderhoof
23W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Greg Fitts
29W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Edward Bernier
164W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Dan Robinson
12W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Dan Dillon
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Christian Basa
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Scott Jolly
28W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Ralph Gildehaus
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Chip Pope
54W–99L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.14
Ricky Ayers
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.