Teams

KCronin/JJoliet (Piper Glen)

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-01vs TInga (Lifetime)Won 31
L#1 DoublesKatie Bissett / Christina Dunn vs Sun Moon / Felicia Ahn6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKathy Harborne vs Mallory Burns6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Moss / Amy DeLaat Marbury vs Julie Ackerlund / Seung Hee Noh6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKatie Cronin / Joanne Joliet vs Jasmine Fontaine / Tania Inga6-0, 6-3
2025-04-25vs LCulp/DGlass (Hornets Nest)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Cronin / Jessica Fink vs Briana Ferraro / Julie Merkelson Dermack6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Bissett / Christina Dunn vs Debbie Glass / Anne Morgan6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Leahy / Kathy Harborne vs Thalia Allen / Kristina Johnson6-1, 6-0
2025-04-24vs KLee/SChandra (CTNC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Cronin / Joanne Joliet vs Jeannine Mortenson / Hilary Diodato6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKathy Harborne vs Sarah Anderson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-17vs LMadonna/PTrantham (WSRC)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesLori Broome / Paula Moss vs Kristyn Atkins / Rhonda Tate0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKathy Harborne vs Rachel Bostic6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Sasser / Joanne Joliet vs Pamela Trantham / Lori Holman6-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesJessica Fink vs Laurie Madonna1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Moss / Sharon Smaston vs Kristina Campbell / Kathy Thompson7-6, 7-6
2025-03-27vs DAlexander/KKuehner (Life Time)Won 31
L#1 DoublesKatie Cronin / Katie Bissett vs Debbie Alexander / Jackie Gyoerkoe5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristina Dunn vs Anait Balasanyan6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Broome / Paula Moss vs Christine King / Amy Rottman7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJessica Fink / Maria Leahy vs Katie Kuehner / Avani Bhamidipati6-2, 7-6
2025-03-20vs SMacVicar (Raintree)Won 41
W#1 DoublesKatie Cronin / Joanne Joliet vs Alexis Schwartz / Adriana Hall6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmy DeLaat Marbury vs Suzanne MacVicar0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Fink / Christina Dunn vs Crissa Klein / Elizabeth Laur6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKathy Harborne vs Andrea Caldini7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Moss / Maria Leahy vs Shannon Burke / Kelly Wolff6-1, 7-6
2025-03-13vs KSalina (PCC)Won 31
W#1 DoublesChristina Dunn / Kathy Harborne vs Meg McSherry / Sara DeVries6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Sasser / Paula Moss vs Larissa Soto / Allison Geoghegan0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAmy DeLaat Marbury vs Kayla Rodriguez6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJessica Fink / Sharon Smaston vs Brooks Herman / Laurie Eatman6-4, 6-2
2025-03-06vs CArevalo (Park Road)Won 32
W#1 DoublesKatie Cronin / Katie Bissett vs Kim Gissy / Kate MacRone7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKathy Harborne vs Peggy Reimann6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAmy DeLaat Marbury / Karen Moss vs Carrie Coulson / Elaine Eisenbaum2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMaria Leahy vs Kimberley Pennington1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLori Broome / Paula Moss vs Connie Arevalo / Heidy Bartell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Christina Dunn
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 3
3.08
Kathy Harborne
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.99
Katie Bissett
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.88
Joanne Joliet
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Jessica Fink
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.81
Katie Cronin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
2.76
Lori Broome
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Amy DeLaat Marbury
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.51
Paula Moss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Sharon Smaston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Leahy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Rachel Sasser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Joliet + Katie Cronin3254% games+3.8% vs expected
Lori Broome + Paula Moss213 matchesnot enough data
Katie Bissett + Christina Dunn123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Bissett + Katie Cronin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christina Dunn
28W–9L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.13
3
Kathy Harborne
115W–77L career · 15 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Katie Bissett
68W–50L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Joanne Joliet
136W–101L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
Jessica Fink
8W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Katie Cronin
27W–29L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Lori Broome
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Amy DeLaat Marbury
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.75
Paula Moss
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Sharon Smaston
5W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.41
Maria Leahy
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Sasser
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.