← Teams

N OR-ET-Tanca

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 2.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Andrew Kullick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Hao Lee
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Paul Choi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
—
Walter Schwane
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 2.5
Results18 ties
2024-08-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesWalter Schwane / Paul Choi vs Shane Coulter / Chris Sbarbaro6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesHao Lee vs Vijay Gosalia6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrew Kullick / Jay Waters vs Sameer Karnik / Bojin Li6-3, 6-0
2024-08-24Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesHao Lee / Paul Choi vs Chi-Hing Choi / Tom Hsu6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAndrew Kullick vs Bernie Lau6-2, 6-1
2024-08-23Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesWalter Schwane / Paul Choi vs Han Zhao / Lucio Tiberi7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAndrew Kullick vs Kyle Peterson6-3, 6-3
2024-08-10Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTim Harris / Walter Schwane vs David Vail / Hunter Chace6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHao Lee / Paul Cretu vs Erik Guttormsen / Rowan Seals6-3, 6-0
2024-08-10Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJay Waters / Paul Choi vs Christo Mroz / David Mikkelson6-2, 6-4
2024-08-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesTim Harris / Walter Schwane vs Han Zhao / Changsong Shen6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Choi / Evan Ridley vs WENSI LI / Chongzhi Di6-3, 6-4
2024-08-09Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesPaul Choi / Brian Hoyt vs Bojin Li / Sameer Karnik6-2, 6-3
2024-07-13Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Bane / Walter Schwane vs Leah Knight / Devin Reilly6-1, 6-3
2024-07-12Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesAmelia Ryan / Walter Schwane vs Monica Boris / Florin Lazar6-3, 6-0
2024-03-30Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesPaul Choi / Evan Ridley vs Hunter Chace / Nicholas Rinck7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-29Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesWalter Schwane / Michael Ryan vs John Koo / Paul Walker6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesHao Lee vs Nicholas Kampars6-1, 6-2
2024-03-17Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesWalter Schwane / Paul Choi vs Cal Szueber / David Ruark6-3, 7-5
2024-03-10Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesTim Harris / Walter Schwane vs Hunter Chace / Erik Guttormsen7-5, 7-6
2024-03-02Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesBrian Hoyt / Walter Schwane vs Patrick Koeberl / Greg Henkhaus6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrew Kullick / Jay Waters vs Ricardo Ascazubi / Bishnu Patra7-6, 6-4
2024-02-25Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesAndrew Kullick / Jay Waters vs Robert Vukanovich / Ty Bross6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWalter Schwane / Mahesh Sreekumar vs Parsa Taghizadeh / John Romanko6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-18Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesWalter Schwane / Hao Lee vs Troy KonigWilcox / Jon Lavietes6-0, 6-4
2024-02-04Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAndrew Kullick / Walter Schwane vs Jungjoo Lee / Byoungsoo Ham6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHao Lee vs Ricardo Ascazubi6-1, 6-4
2023-12-09Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesWalter Schwane / Jennifer Bane vs Christian Paulsen / Jane Paulsen6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Andrew Kullick
19W–14L career
0%88%12%
2.90
3
Hao Lee
23W–32L career
2%98%0%
2.74
2.5
Paul Choi
16W–18L career
0%42%58%
2.48
2.5
Walter Schwane
20W–38L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.