Teams

ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Julie Glew
published
3.23
Katherine Ness
published
3.21
Anita Fenichel
published 3.5
3.19
Kathryn Shedrick
published
3.18
Roberta Dapelo
published
3.18
Yvonne Kleinfeld
published
3.18
Gwendolyn Baert
published
3.18
Chris Homen
published 3.5
3.15
Diana Jex
published 3.5
3.07
April Frederick
published 3.5
3.03
Lety Ruiz
published
3.02
Elizabeth Kao
published
3.01
Rocely Chu
published
3.00
Elina Avila
published
3.00
Alison Luna
published 3
2.98
Yumi Iwane
published
2.90
Nicole Pacheco
published
2.89
Sarah Beldo
published
2.81
Gillian Galligan
published
2.72
Edwina Russell
published
2.69
Kimberly A Pometta
published
2.68
Gia Dinicola
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Pacheco + Sarah Beldo7257% games+11.1% vs expected
Rocely Chu + Kimberly A Pometta2348% games−6.5% vs expected
Kimberly A Pometta + Yvonne Kleinfeld213 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly A Pometta + Yumi Iwane213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Glew
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Katherine Ness
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Anita Fenichel
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Kathryn Shedrick
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Roberta Dapelo
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Yvonne Kleinfeld
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Gwendolyn Baert
4W–20L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Chris Homen
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Diana Jex
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
April Frederick
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Lety Ruiz
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Elizabeth Kao
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Rocely Chu
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Elina Avila
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Alison Luna
9W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Yumi Iwane
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Nicole Pacheco
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
Sarah Beldo
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Gillian Galligan
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Edwina Russell
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Kimberly A Pometta
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Gia Dinicola
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.