Teams

Love All

2026 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0

22 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Kerry Williams
published
2.75
Dena Visencio
published 3
2.73
Erica Pollack
published
2.68
Beatriz Rivera
published 3
2.68
Susie Lundeen-smuck
published
2.67
Lisa Coleman
published
2.66
Lori Galvin
published
2.63
Andrea Moxley
published 3
2.63
Carrie Leonard
published 3
2.60
Suzanne Plotkin
published
2.54
Karen Drake
published
2.50
Sophie Clowes
published
2.49
Lili Mineni
published
2.46
Christin Field
published 2.5
2.46
Kim Park
published
2.43
Charlene Conklin
published 3
2.39
Shireen Russell
published
2.37
Debbie Tuttle
published 3
2.30
Lisa Jasso
published
2.30
Joan Marason
published
2.23
PAMELA COLBERT
published
2.07
Bindiya Jain
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Coleman + Andrea Moxley2445% games+3.3% vs expected
Sophie Clowes + Christin Field2445% gamesnot enough data
Beatriz Rivera + Susie Lundeen-smuck1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerry Williams
7W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Dena Visencio
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Erica Pollack
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Beatriz Rivera
8W–18L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Susie Lundeen-smuck
8W–16L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Lisa Coleman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Lori Galvin
3W–11L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Andrea Moxley
2W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Carrie Leonard
3W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Suzanne Plotkin
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Karen Drake
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Sophie Clowes
5W–11L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Lili Mineni
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Christin Field
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
Kim Park
0W–10L career · no lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
3
Charlene Conklin
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.43
Shireen Russell
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
3
Debbie Tuttle
1W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.37
Lisa Jasso
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.30
Joan Marason
0W–7L career · no lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.30
PAMELA COLBERT
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.23
2.5
Bindiya Jain
0W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.