Teams

BCC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-13vs BRMST GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Ondash / Barbara Stager vs Kelly Horace / Janine Huber6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Studebaker / Susan Cooper vs Pam Decker / Sharla Prom6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Studebaker / Richelle Burnett vs Iris Shaw / Susan Wilson6-2, 6-1
2024-05-30vs CVTA PINKWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisabeth Warshafsky / Kelly Daly vs Julia Garza / Susan MacLeod7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Studebaker / Josephine Warfield vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-23vs ARCA BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Christin / Kelly Daly vs Linda Ceccanti / Gail Dillon6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Cooper / Melissa Ondash vs Sherrie Peterson / Jennifer Butler6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-16vs MEA NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Ondash / Richelle Burnett vs Vera Moreno-Hamm / Kristen Royer5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLaura Studebaker / Kelly Daly vs Carolyn Sanders / Susan Peterson3-6, 4-6
2024-05-09vs BRMST GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Studebaker / Tricia Dessel vs Beth Saperstein / Pam Decker3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Annette Wright
published 3
Barbara Stager
published 3
2.72
Melissa Ondash
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Lauren Christin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Laura Studebaker
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.60
CAROLYN PAUL
published 3
2.59
Lisabeth Warshafsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Josephine Warfield
published
Kelly Daly
published
Richelle Burnett
published
Tricia Dessel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Studebaker + Melissa Ondash4162% games+15.6% vs expected
Laura Studebaker + Josephine Warfield213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Annette Wright
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Barbara Stager
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Melissa Ondash
57W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.72
3
Lauren Christin
72W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Laura Studebaker
96W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
3
CAROLYN PAUL
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Lisabeth Warshafsky
37W–39L career · 1 line in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.59
Josephine Warfield
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Daly
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richelle Burnett
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tricia Dessel
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.