Teams

MMcSherry (PCC)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesMeg McSherry / Cindy Stater vs Leslee Black / Dana Zimmer6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-04-19vs LMadonna (Weddington)Won 20
W#1 DoublesCindy Stater / Barbara van Meerten vs Jona Ashford / Sue Selleck6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLaurie Eatman / Brenley Ogden vs Laurie Madonna / Maryann Whalen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-16vs SKopf (Raintree)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLaurie Eatman / Cindy Stater vs Emily Ladky / Heather Toye3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Geoghegan / Laurie Eatman vs Ree Snyder / Cameron Devitt6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-29vs CMcKiernan/VShannon (Raintree)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMeg McSherry / Laurie Eatman vs Peyton Foley / Mary Anne Bullock6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCindy Stater vs Vicky Shannon0-6, 0-6
2022-03-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara van Meerten / Laurie Eatman vs Kate Wodyka / Janie Miller6-2, 6-2
2022-03-14vs TAmos/AEagan (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Eatman / Allison Geoghegan vs Tracy Amos / Olivia Day1-6, 4-6
2022-03-01vs RJampani (Blakeney)Split 11
W#1 DoublesBarbara van Meerten / Cindy Stater vs Diane DeMus / Melanie Cox6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrenley Ogden / Laurie Eatman vs Alia Nassri / Lindsay Nichols1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.51
Laurie Eatman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.40
Allison Geoghegan
published 2.5
2.31
Brenley Ogden
published 2.5
2.19
Barbara van Meerten
published 2.5
2.17
Cindy Stater
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Meg McSherry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Eatman + Cindy Stater3347% games+8.7% vs expected
Laurie Eatman + Barbara van Meerten134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Laurie Eatman
19W–51L career · 7 lines in 2022
0%47%53%
2.51
2.5
Allison Geoghegan
8W–19L career · no lines in 2022
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Brenley Ogden
6W–16L career · no lines in 2022
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Barbara van Meerten
2W–18L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Cindy Stater
22W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.17
Meg McSherry
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.