Teams

Mansfield

2026 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-04vs McDonald 4.5 18+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSally Leary / Alexis Junker vs Jodi Schley / Elisabeth Walker2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJane Lent vs Kristen Ewers2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesGina Carlson vs Rachel LaTour1-6, 2-6
2026-02-25vs Buhr 4.5 WinterLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Lent / Sydney Rott vs Maura Smiley / Margaret Kelley4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSally Leary vs Sarah Buhr5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesErika Skanse / Gina Carlson vs Martha Ginder / Kathryn Bergmann1-6, 4-6
2026-02-11vs Jorgenson-Bowles Point TakenLost 13
W#1 DoublesJane Lent / Lesley Longval vs Taylor Reiners / Isabel Thiner2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSally Leary vs Lauren Madsen5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSydney Rott / Gina Carlson vs Theresa Carlson / Betsy Sedlak4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlexis Junker / Barbara Brill vs Julie Bowles / Kristin Nesseth0-6, 4-6
2026-02-04vs HANSEN 4.5 WINTER 2026Lost 23
L#1 DoublesAndrea Peterson / Karen Feagler vs Dilcia Stromberg / Noelle Dougan6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSydney Rott vs Faith Dougan7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelsey Aden / Lana Pinnock vs Nina Lind / Isabella Taleon1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAlexis Junker vs Clare Palen1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJanice Ring / Suzy Griffith vs Katie Fleming / Emily Walz Lockhart6-2, 7-6
2026-01-28vs Estey-Alexander 4.5 - W2026Lost 14
L#1 DoublesSydney Rott / Shanshan Ge vs Molly Hemes / Victoria Bravo7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJane Lent vs Brooke Hapuku3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Jayne Crocker / Alexis Junker vs Marti Estey / Sofia Terzic6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBarbara Brill vs Andrea Boado2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLana Pinnock / Gina Carlson vs Jane Booth-Tobin / Amanda Hiatt6-2, 7-5
2026-01-21vs Opfer/Wahlstrand 4.25Lost 05
L#1 DoublesJane Lent / Shanshan Ge vs Alana Whiteley / Tzivia Leviton3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKelsey Aden vs Mallory Lithun1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Ring / Suzy Griffith vs Patrice Meger / Julie Opfer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMary Jayne Crocker vs Hayley Helberg2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlexis Junker / Gina Carlson vs Carol Wahlstrand / Britt Weber1-6, 2-6
2026-01-14vs McDonald 4.5 18+Lost 14
L#1 DoublesAndrea Peterson / Sydney Rott vs Michaela Schulz / Suzie Heideman2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJane Lent vs Kristen Ewers7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Jayne Crocker / Leslie Connelly vs Sara Humann / Jodi Schley2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBarbara Brill vs Rachel LaTour0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShanshan Ge / Lesley Longval vs Christine Conner / Jennifer Miller6-3, 6-3
2026-01-07vs Buhr 4.5 WinterLost 23
L#1 DoublesLeslie Connelly / Shanshan Ge vs Maura Smiley / Margaret Kelley3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJane Lent vs Lindsey Henderson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Jayne Crocker / Kelsey Aden vs Lea Blackwell Favor / Ann Stauch4-6, 2-5
L#2 SinglesGina Carlson vs Katherine Arneson4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Ring / Suzy Griffith vs Jennifer Magnuson / Kathryn Bergmann6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Kelsey Aden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.09
Jane Lent
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
4.08
Sydney Rott
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.06
Lesley Longval
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.05
Shanshan Ge
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.99
Sally Leary
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
Leslie Connelly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Karen Feagler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Mary Jayne Crocker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.82
Janice Ring
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Erika Skanse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Lana Pinnock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Alexis Junker
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.56
Suzy Griffith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Barbara Brill
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.48
Gina Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Ring + Suzy Griffith141549% games+3.1% vs expected
Gina Carlson + Mary Jayne Crocker224 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Connelly + Sally Leary213 matchesnot enough data
Shanshan Ge + Gina Carlson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelsey Aden
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.16
Jane Lent
11W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.09
Sydney Rott
8W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
Lesley Longval
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
4.06
Shanshan Ge
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.05
Sally Leary
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.99
Leslie Connelly
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.98
Karen Feagler
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.94
Mary Jayne Crocker
8W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
Janice Ring
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Erika Skanse
27W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Lana Pinnock
23W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Alexis Junker
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Suzy Griffith
17W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Barbara Brill
9W–54L career · 9 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Gina Carlson
19W–37L career · 12 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.