Teams

PD40/McCaffrey/PTC

2023 STA Adult Combo 40 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 7.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Jackie Bowers
published
3.71
3.60
Natalia Hardalau
published
3.56
Carol Alan
published 4
3.55
Lara Blaisdell
published
3.38
Amanda Lane
published 3.5
3.38
Tanya Sari
published
3.34
Hether Enzor
published
3.32
Kay Zobrist
published
3.31
Kell Culclasure
published
3.26
Jean Witt
published
3.23
Patricia Blackwell
published
3.21
Marie Player
published
3.18
Raquel Lastimoso
published
3.17
Tammy Achziger
published
3.17
Pat Gleaton
published
3.13
Lucy OHare
published
3.08
Allison Patrick
published 3.5
3.04
Kathy Gatlin
published
3.02
Carla Talley
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Lane + Raquel Lastimoso5365% games+11.4% vs expected
Raquel Lastimoso + Kay Zobrist20168% games+9.9% vs expected
Tammy Achziger + Tanya Sari2644% games+9.6% vs expected
Hether Enzor + Allison Patrick61344% games+6.5% vs expected
Kay Zobrist + Lucy OHare17860% games+5.5% vs expected
Kathy Gatlin + Kell Culclasure2445% games+4.1% vs expected
Annette McCaffrey + Natalia Hardalau5256% games+0.6% vs expected
Annette McCaffrey + Jackie Bowers4454% games−2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jackie Bowers
90W–55L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Annette McCaffrey
56W–43L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Natalia Hardalau
40W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.60
4
Carol Alan
35W–30L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
Lara Blaisdell
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Amanda Lane
33W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
3.38
Tanya Sari
17W–36L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
Hether Enzor
49W–50L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.34
Kay Zobrist
77W–38L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32
Kell Culclasure
26W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.31
Jean Witt
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26
Patricia Blackwell
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%5%95%
3.23
Marie Player
47W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.21
Raquel Lastimoso
53W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.18
Tammy Achziger
25W–47L career · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.17
Pat Gleaton
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Lucy OHare
58W–45L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.13
3.5
Allison Patrick
24W–48L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.08
Kathy Gatlin
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.04
3.5
Carla Talley
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.