Teams

Serve ‘um up!

2023 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.40 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-07vs Go Team ALOHAWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarlynn Barte / Peggy Watanabe vs Mieko Takada / Saori Morio6-4, 6-1
2023-10-01vs Triple the FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesEan Smith / Marci Amii vs Ashley Cabral / Nikki Morimoto4-6, 2-6
2023-09-17vs Go Team ALOHAWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarlynn Barte / Marci Amii vs Yukie O Brewer / Tomoko Balbirona6-2, 6-2
2023-09-10vs Triple the FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesJunko Kadomatsu / Marci Amii vs Akiko Oshiro / Shannon Rogers6-2, 6-2
2023-08-27vs Triple the FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesEan Smith / Marci Amii vs Caasi Nakasone / Nikki Morimoto5-7, 2-6
2023-08-20vs Go Team ALOHAWon 10
W#1 DoublesJunko Kadomatsu / Ean Smith vs Saori Morio / Tomoko Balbirona6-1, 6-1
2023-08-06vs Go Team ALOHAWon 10
W#1 DoublesEan Smith / Marci Amii vs Mieko Takada / Yuriko Christopher6-0, 7-5
2023-07-30vs Triple the FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeggy Watanabe / Marci Amii vs Shannon Rogers / Ashley Cabral3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Triple the Fun7171252
2Serve ‘um up!5353657
3Go Team ALOHA08081699

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Junko Kadomatsu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.39
Peggy Watanabe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Marci Amii
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Ean Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Darlynn Barte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Watanabe + Junko Kadomatsu7260% games+0.2% vs expected
Darlynn Barte + Marci Amii7162% games−0.5% vs expected
Peggy Watanabe + Darlynn Barte4157% games−1.5% vs expected
Peggy Watanabe + Ean Smith5159% games−3.1% vs expected
Junko Kadomatsu + Ean Smith404 matchesnot enough data
Peggy Watanabe + Marci Amii123 matchesnot enough data
Marci Amii + Junko Kadomatsu213 matchesnot enough data
Marci Amii + Ean Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Junko Kadomatsu
99W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Peggy Watanabe
255W–97L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Marci Amii
83W–45L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Ean Smith
54W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Darlynn Barte
92W–84L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.