Teams

Wildcats

2023 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-04-03vs Kau Belles 6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnnie Carey / Heather FREIDKIN vs Sarah Schrieber / Denese Cavanaugh6-3, 6-4
2023-03-25vs TiebreakersWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather FREIDKIN / Marcy Kreindler vs Denise Plude / Nancy Pinto6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Theis / Cindy Pohoryles vs Catherine Donaldson / Mary Ellen Shearer5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-13vs BreslerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarcy Kreindler / Heather FREIDKIN vs Jelena Mitrovic / Lilah Blackstone1-6, 3-6
2023-03-04vs TiebreakersLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Gambon / Cindy Pohoryles vs Denise Plude / Helen Mahoney6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-25vs BreslerWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather FREIDKIN / Marcy Kreindler vs Sheila O'Connell / Yvette Fontenot6-3, 6-3
2023-02-18vs Kau Belles 6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesMarcy Kreindler / Heather FREIDKIN vs Nicole Ifill / Jonaki Bose6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Singer / Cindy Pohoryles vs Katherine Dodson / Shirley Hsieh-Lau3-6, 1-6
2023-02-09vs TiebreakersLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnie Carey / Ann Batlle vs Liz Price / Cathy Robertson0-6, 0-6
2023-02-04vs BreslerLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnie Carey / Cindy Pohoryles vs Laura McNay / Linda Shaffer3-6, 4-6
2023-01-27vs Kau Belles 6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Pohoryles / Alexa Grossman vs Jonaki Bose / Shirley Hsieh-Lau2-6, 1-6
2023-01-11vs BreslerLost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Ballard / Heather FREIDKIN vs Carina Villagra / Anto Faini2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Paru Rellan
published
3.67
Desiree Drakakis
published 4
3.37
Annie Carey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Heather FREIDKIN
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.18
Tracy Ballard
published
3.15
Victoria Quint
published
2.95
Mia Dentoni
published
2.74
Cindy Pohoryles
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.71
Gail Ribas
published
2.64
Pamela Gambon
published
Bonnie Skafte
published 2.5
Holly Keen
published
Suzanne Singer
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paru Rellan
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Desiree Drakakis
20W–22L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Annie Carey
111W–86L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Heather FREIDKIN
155W–74L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Tracy Ballard
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Victoria Quint
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Mia Dentoni
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Cindy Pohoryles
56W–96L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
Gail Ribas
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Pamela Gambon
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
2.5
Bonnie Skafte
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Holly Keen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzanne Singer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.