Teams

EE:Wimble

2026 VT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women Flight 1

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-20vs MIT:The Courtiers:RepkaWon 41
W#1 DoublesPamela Clapp / Mary Beth Pinard vs Nancy Spears / Sara Marshall6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJudith Wimble vs Lindsay Repka5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLori Roberts / Vivianne Ivanier vs Maureen Carn / Mary Kirkpatrick6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesClare Hogan vs Mary Saudade6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRebecca Stevens / Maja Smith vs Sara McClallen / Martha Edelson6-3, 6-2
2026-06-13vs MIT:The Courtiers:RepkaWon 30
W#1 DoublesVivianne Ivanier / Alana Lowry vs Cia Ochsenbein / Martha Davis6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPamela Clapp / Clare Hogan vs Peggy Clement / Cathleen Giannattasio6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJudith Wimble vs Cinny Lawrence6-4, 6-0
2026-06-07vs MIT:The Courtiers:RepkaWon 40
W#1 DoublesLori Roberts / Mary Beth Pinard vs Sara Marshall / Maureen Carn6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJudith Wimble / Alana Lowry vs Lindsay Repka / Martha Edelson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDeShan Foret vs Mary Saudade7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMegan Shrestha / Kate Cunningham vs Peggy Clement / Cathleen Giannattasio6-1, 6-1
2026-05-23vs MIT:The Courtiers:RepkaWon 41
W#1 DoublesLori Roberts / Vivianne Ivanier vs Peggy Clement / Cathleen Giannattasio6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPamela Clapp vs Lindsay Repka6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Fonseca / Alana Lowry vs Martha Davis / Cia Ochsenbein3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesClare Hogan vs Natasha Tarrant6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Stevens / Maja Smith vs Mary Kirkpatrick / Susan Snider6-4, 7-6
2026-05-17vs MIT:The Courtiers:RepkaWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Beth Pinard / Lori Roberts vs Peggy Clement / Cathleen Giannattasio6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJudith Wimble vs Lindsay Repka5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDeShan Foret / Alana Lowry vs Nancy Spears / Susan Snider7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKate Cunningham / Clare Hogan vs Mary Kirkpatrick / Sara McClallen6-1, 6-1
2026-05-09vs MIT:The Courtiers:RepkaWon 40
W#1 DoublesLori Roberts / Vivianne Ivanier vs Sara Marshall / Mary Saudade6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMary Beth Pinard vs Martha Davis6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCindy Fonseca / Clare Hogan vs Peggy Clement / Cathleen Giannattasio6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKate Cunningham / Maja Smith vs Nancy Spears / Susan Snider5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women Flight 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EE:Wimble6024614179
2MIT:The Courtiers:Repka0662450323

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Judith Wimble
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.46
Pamela Clapp
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Clare Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.34
Mary Beth Pinard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.33
Alana Lowry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
DeShan Foret
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Cindy Fonseca
published 3.5
Deidre Riehle
published 3.5
3.23
Vivianne Ivanier
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Kate Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.79
Maja Smith
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Megan Shrestha
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maja Smith + Kate Cunningham213 matchesnot enough data
Kate Cunningham + Mary Beth Pinard303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judith Wimble
17W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Pamela Clapp
45W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
4
Clare Hogan
11W–2L career · type D · 5 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.44
Mary Beth Pinard
41W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Alana Lowry
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
DeShan Foret
7W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Cindy Fonseca
15W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Deidre Riehle
41W–36L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Vivianne Ivanier
34W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.23
Kate Cunningham
45W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
Maja Smith
20W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
Megan Shrestha
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.