Teams

SD 3.0 RPTC/ Ng

2023 SoCal Fall Doubles SD- WE · SD WE Women 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesKhanh Nguyen / Chenyang Rickard vs Cindy Chu / Dianne Golingan2-6, 1-6
2023-11-24vs SD 3.0 SDTRC/ KleinerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJenn Lau / Sheila Birtsas vs Carly Jackson / Erin Smith4-6, 5-7
2023-11-05vs SD LLW 3.0 Balboa TC/ La CrueWon 10
W#2 DoublesSheila Birtsas / Jori Tulkki vs Angela Christian / Melissa MacK6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-11-05vs SD LLW 3.0 Balboa TC/ La CrueLost 01
L#1 DoublesJenn Lau / Sheila Birtsas vs Megumi Bolger / Suzanne Pham2-6, 3-6
2023-10-22vs SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ NguyenLost 01
L#2 DoublesSheila Birtsas / Carolyn Shea vs Grace Daly / Sonia Peterson0-6, 0-6
2023-10-15vs SD 3.0 Santaluz/ FloresLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheila Birtsas / Khanh Nguyen vs CHRISTINE DWYER / Elizabeth Li5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2023-10-08vs SD 3.0 SDTRC/ KleinerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheila Birtsas / Lorena Maquera vs Nancy Swirhun / Lisa Bolelli2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-10-01vs SD 3.0 Santaluz/ FloresSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJenn Lau / Chenyang Rickard vs Marla Vandling / Rachel Wagner3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSheila Birtsas / Carolyn Shea vs Amy Poling / Debbie Kuntz6-4, 7-6
W#1 DoublesChenyang Rickard / Khanh Nguyen vs Irena Hukari / Robin Kardon6-4, 6-1
2023-09-10vs SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ NguyenLost 01
L#1 DoublesKhanh Nguyen / Chenyang Rickard vs Kristin Montgomery / Karen Sahd6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD WE Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Jenn Lau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Sheila Birtsas
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.96
Jori Tulkki
published
2.88
Chenyang Rickard
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.86
Lorena Maquera
published
2.66
Katherine Ng
published
2.49
Jennifer DeBiasi
published
Khanh Nguyen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheila Birtsas + Jenn Lau3546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jenn Lau
45W–38L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Sheila Birtsas
62W–48L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06
Jori Tulkki
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Chenyang Rickard
66W–74L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
Lorena Maquera
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
Katherine Ng
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Jennifer DeBiasi
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.49
Khanh Nguyen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.