Teams

Marion/McMahon/65&Over7.0M

2025 Marion Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Adult Men 65 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-31vs Villages LieseSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRob Pridgen / CARL TURNER vs Michael Dimitroff / Guy Ford2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Shisler / Rick Edlund vs Paul Bosco / James Probola6-2, 6-2
2025-02-16vs Villages - JamesWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Seekamp / Matthew Pirtle vs Ronnie McFarling / Roland Ciaramitaro6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSunil Gandhi / Michael Tringali vs Steve Gilman / Robert Mazzeo6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTom Swift / Martin McMahon vs Robert Anglace / Blake Gall4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-09vs Villages LieseWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Seekamp / Matthew Pirtle vs Daniel Wheeler / Michael Dimitroff6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSunil Gandhi / Michael Tringali vs Paul Bosco / James Probola6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMartin McMahon / Dennis Malone vs Peter Morreale / Barry Kilroy6-1, 6-2
2025-01-26vs Villages LieseWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Seekamp / Matthew Pirtle vs Paul Bosco / Glenn Gaffney6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDennis Malone / Michael Tringali vs Michael Dimitroff / Guy Ford7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSteven Shisler / Tom Swift vs Barry Kilroy / Peter Morreale6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult Men 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Christopher Seekamp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Matthew Pirtle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Tom Swift
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Dennis Malone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Rick Edlund
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
CARL TURNER
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Martin McMahon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Tringali
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rob Pridgen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Shisler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sunil Gandhi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Seekamp + Matthew Pirtle6163% gamesnot enough data
Michael Tringali + Sunil Gandhi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christopher Seekamp
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Matthew Pirtle
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Tom Swift
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Dennis Malone
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
Rick Edlund
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
CARL TURNER
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Martin McMahon
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Tringali
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rob Pridgen
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Steven Shisler
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sunil Gandhi
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.