Teams

GDichter.40C-CHTC

2026 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Eve

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 10 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
Sep 17 6:30 PM
North Carolina Central University
Sep 24 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
Oct 1 8:00 PM
Duke University Faculty Club
Oct 8 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
2026-09-03vs DBaddour.40C-CHCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSravan Narayan / Michael Meltsner vs Kenneth Nelson / Richard Woods5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJackson Naftel / Santha Perian vs Wes Talman / Chris Hanes4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Hamrin / Nathan Bearman vs Christian Shelby / Niels Lameijer6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-08-20vs EAnderson-DFCWon 21
L#1 DoublesNathan Bearman / Jackson Naftel vs Erik J Erikson / Charles Wood7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGabriel Dichter / Michael Meltsner vs Edmund Malesky / Nick Buchler6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesZachary Osofsky / Santha Perian vs Edward Anderson / Eric Labow6-2, 6-0
2026-08-13vs DBaddour.40C-CHCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSravan Narayan / Reed Breneman vs Kenneth Nelson / David Baddour6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Meltsner / Stewart Bible vs Robert Stewart / Niels Lameijer1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRahul Narang / Nathan Bearman vs Bryant Tran / Chris Hanes6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GDichter.40C-CHTC1030225
2DBaddour.40C-CHCC0103632

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Sravan Narayan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Gabriel Dichter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Jackson Naftel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
4.12
Zachary Osofsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Stewart Bible
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
David Hamrin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Dan Clemson
published 4.5
4.00
Rahul Narang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Reed Breneman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Santha Perian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.92
Michael Meltsner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Nathan Bearman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Santha Perian + Praveen Krishnamurthy271158% games+5.8% vs expected
Rahul Narang + Praveen Krishnamurthy852758% games+4.1% vs expected
Santha Perian + Rahul Narang7456% games+3.1% vs expected
Nathan Bearman + Reed Breneman303 matchesnot enough data
Zachary Osofsky + Dan Clemson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sravan Narayan
20W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Gabriel Dichter
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Jackson Naftel
66W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Praveen Krishnamurthy
239W–127L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
Zachary Osofsky
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
19%80%<1%
4.12
Stewart Bible
15W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.11
4.5
David Hamrin
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
23%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Dan Clemson
20W–10L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Rahul Narang
295W–125L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
Reed Breneman
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Santha Perian
210W–108L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Michael Meltsner
58W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Nathan Bearman
118W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.