Teams

LATA18/Patterson/LCTC

2025 Fall 18 & Over-LATA · Fall Adult Men - 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Fall Adult Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Bryan Lynip
published 4
3.53
Brendan Pfab
published 3.5
3.52
James Youmans
published
3.44
Dave Crossland
published 3.5
3.36
Cory Cox
published 3.5
3.29
Bryan Blitch
published 3.5
3.29
Jason Patterson
published
3.26
Christopher Leigh
published 3.5
Bruce Cope
published 3.5
3.21
Evan Graves
published
3.20
Duke Taylor
published
3.15
Gabriel Moura
published
3.12
Jason Isenhower
published
3.01
Kaden Watson
published
2.89
Andrew Keough
published 3
2.79
Evan Hefelfinger
published
Grant Shadwell
published
Gregory Whitley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jeremy Coliton
published
Shawn McCarthy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Crossland + Cory Cox15462% games+10.9% vs expected
Bryan Blitch + Andrew Keough3345% games−1.5% vs expected
James Youmans + Jason Patterson303 matchesnot enough data
Kaden Watson + Christopher Leigh213 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Keough + Grant Shadwell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryan Lynip
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
3.5
Brendan Pfab
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
James Youmans
33W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Dave Crossland
24W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
3.5
Cory Cox
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Bryan Blitch
7W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Jason Patterson
35W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Christopher Leigh
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Bruce Cope
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Evan Graves
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Duke Taylor
6W–19L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Gabriel Moura
24W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.15
Jason Isenhower
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Kaden Watson
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Andrew Keough
16W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Evan Hefelfinger
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.79
Grant Shadwell
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gregory Whitley
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeremy Coliton
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn McCarthy
15W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.