Teams

Hit or Miss

2025 FLEX DYNAMIC DUO · Women 3.0

4 players · average NTRP 2.75 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-03vs Comeback QueensLost 01
L#2 SinglesStacy Lamb vs Karen Sheehan3-6
2025-09-24vs RacquettesLost 01
L#2 SinglesStacy Lamb vs Stacey Kozakar2-6
2025-09-21vs Swingin' SeestersLost 01
L#2 SinglesStacy Lamb vs Loren Cross3-6
2025-09-20vs The One Where We Play TennisLost 01
L#2 SinglesStacy Lamb vs Jessika Hulewsky0-6
2025-09-18vs Triple ThreatLost 01
L#1 SinglesNatalie Chatfield vs Alice Livesay0-6
2025-09-17vs Run Jenny RunLost 01
L#2 SinglesStacy Lamb vs Jennifer Rusk2-6
2025-08-22vs Net asSASSinsLost 01
L#2 SinglesStacy Lamb vs Amy Pugsley0-6
2025-08-17vs Dynamic DeuceLost 02
L#1 SinglesStacy Lamb vs Jenna Matsumura2-6
L#2 SinglesNatalie Chatfield vs Nicole Oddonetto0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The One Where We Play Tennis100273363
2Net asSASSins91237791
3Dynamic Deuce82201010103
4Let's do this64151515141
5Run Jenny Run46131717133
6Comeback Queens28121818143
7Racquettes28111919153
8Swingin' Seesters2862424162
9Hit or Miss01012929175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Stacy Lamb
usually #2 Singles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3
2.40
Natalie Chatfield
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Trevi Hardy
published
Vita Mobley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trevi Hardy + Vita Mobley224 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Chatfield + Stacy Lamb033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Stacy Lamb
4W–11L career · type S · 7 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Natalie Chatfield
20W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.40
Trevi Hardy
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vita Mobley
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.